PPH vs. VXUS
PPH (VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PPH returned 8.39%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for VXUS. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPH charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
PPH vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 15.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PPH has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 8.39%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.
PPH
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 3.80%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.39%
VXUS
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- YTD
- 15.42%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 32.10%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
PPH vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.96% | 22.00% | 8.05% | 6.95% | 2.64% | 17.79% | 5.49% | 19.39% | -5.89% | 15.23% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 15.42% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPH and VXUS is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PPH and VXUS has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PPH vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PPH
VXUS
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
PPH
VXUS
Industrials
PPH
VXUS
Basic Materials
PPH
-
VXUS
Communication Services
PPH
-
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
PPH
-
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
PPH
-
VXUS
Energy
PPH
-
VXUS
Financial Services
PPH
-
VXUS
Real Estate
PPH
-
VXUS
Technology
PPH
-
VXUS
Utilities
PPH
-
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPH vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
PPH
VXUS
PPH vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPH | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.37 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 2.86 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | 11.00 | -6.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPH vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPH | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.45% | -35.97% | -15.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -11.27% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -13.58% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.26% | -29.44% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | -35.97% | +6.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | 0.00% | -4.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.29% | -8.20% | -9.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 2.93% | +1.52% |
Volatility
PPH vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) is 5.95%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that PPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPH | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 6.87% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 14.09% | -1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 16.11% | +1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 16.23% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 17.21% | -0.21% |
PPH vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPH vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than VXUS's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.05% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.63% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPH and VXUS have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to PPH (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPH dropped -51.45% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 10.23% vs 8.39% for PPH. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, PPH has been the lower-risk option at 5.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 8.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PPH.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 2.05% for PPH.
PPH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PPH and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPH and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer