PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPH vs. PSCH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPH vs. PSCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than PSCH's 1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PPH has outperformed PSCH with an annualized return of 7.46%, while PSCH has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.


PPH

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
2.14%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
7.46%

PSCH

1D
1.28%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
1.80%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
0.45%
5Y*
-5.72%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPH vs. PSCH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
-0.76%22.00%8.05%6.95%2.64%17.79%5.49%19.39%-5.89%15.23%
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
1.80%-0.49%3.77%-2.71%-25.15%5.75%31.47%20.17%9.15%34.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PPH and PSCH is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

0.64

The correlation between PPH and PSCH shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PPH vs. PSCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PPH
PSCH

Healthcare

100.0%
97.3%

Industrials

0.1%
0.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

1.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PPH
100.0%
PSCH
97.3%

Industrials

PPH
0.1%
PSCH
0.7%

Basic Materials

PPH

-

PSCH

-

Communication Services

PPH

-

PSCH

-

Consumer Cyclical

PPH

-

PSCH

-

Consumer Defensive

PPH

-

PSCH

-

Energy

PPH

-

PSCH

-

Financial Services

PPH

-

PSCH
1.1%

Real Estate

PPH

-

PSCH

-

Technology

PPH

-

PSCH
1.7%

Utilities

PPH

-

PSCH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPH vs. PSCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPH
PPH Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCH
PSCH Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PSCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCH Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPH vs. PSCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPHPSCHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.10

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

0.67

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.88

1.84

+2.04

PPH vs. PSCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPH Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the PSCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPH and PSCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPHPSCHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.51

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

-0.25

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.29

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.51

-0.21

Drawdowns

PPH vs. PSCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, which is greater than PSCH's maximum drawdown of -46.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and PSCH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPHPSCHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.45%

-46.32%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-15.36%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-22.98%

+4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.26%

-46.32%

+26.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.70%

-46.32%

+16.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.34%

-30.59%

+22.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-13.46%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

5.54%

-0.93%

Volatility

PPH vs. PSCH - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) at 4.19%. This indicates that PPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPHPSCHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

4.19%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

14.06%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26%

20.26%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.07%

22.89%

-7.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

23.63%

-6.67%

PPH vs. PSCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCH's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPH vs. PSCH - Dividend Comparison

PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than PSCH's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
2.12%1.78%1.98%2.09%1.55%1.62%1.66%1.77%1.97%1.92%2.43%1.93%
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
0.01%0.04%0.27%0.01%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPH and PSCH have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPH has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to PSCH (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPH dropped -51.45% vs PSCH's -46.32%.

On 10-year performance, PPH leads with 7.46% vs 6.81% for PSCH. On fees, PSCH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCH has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PPH has performed better with a 7.46% return vs 6.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PPH.

PPH has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.01% for PSCH.

PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while PSCH tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PPH and 0.29% for PSCH.

PPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPH and PSCH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer