PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPH vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPH vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 11.71% return. Over the past 10 years, PPH has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 7.46%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.66% annualized return.


PPH

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
2.14%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
7.46%

FXAIX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.80%
YTD
11.71%
6M
11.74%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
22.75%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
15.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPH vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
-0.76%22.00%8.05%6.95%2.64%17.79%5.49%19.39%-5.89%15.23%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
11.71%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PPH and FXAIX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between PPH and FXAIX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPH vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPH
PPH Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPH vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPHFXAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.46

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

3.36

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.88

15.70

-11.81

PPH vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPH Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPH and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPHFXAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.52

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.85

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.87

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.82

-0.52

Drawdowns

PPH vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPHFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.45%

-33.79%

-17.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-8.89%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-18.76%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.26%

-24.50%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.70%

-33.79%

+4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.34%

0.00%

-8.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-3.79%

-13.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

1.90%

+2.71%

Volatility

PPH vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 2.83%. This indicates that PPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPHFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

2.83%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

8.97%

+2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26%

11.86%

+5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.07%

16.91%

-1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

18.07%

-1.11%

PPH vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPH vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than FXAIX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.03%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
2.12%1.78%1.98%2.09%1.55%1.62%1.66%1.77%1.97%1.92%2.43%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPH and FXAIX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPH has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to FXAIX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPH dropped -51.45% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPH and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer