PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPH vs. BTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPH vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PPH

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
2.14%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
7.46%

BTEC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPH vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


PPH vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PPH
BTEC

Healthcare

100.0%
99.4%

Industrials

0.1%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PPH
100.0%
BTEC
99.4%

Industrials

PPH
0.1%
BTEC
0.6%

Basic Materials

PPH

-

BTEC

-

Communication Services

PPH

-

BTEC

-

Consumer Cyclical

PPH

-

BTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

PPH

-

BTEC

-

Energy

PPH

-

BTEC

-

Financial Services

PPH

-

BTEC

-

Real Estate

PPH

-

BTEC

-

Technology

PPH

-

BTEC

-

Utilities

PPH

-

BTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPH vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPH
PPH Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BTEC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPH vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPHBTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.88

PPH vs. BTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPHBTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

Drawdowns

PPH vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and BTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPHBTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.45%

0.00%

-51.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.34%

0.00%

-8.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

0.00%

-17.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

Volatility

PPH vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPHBTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26%

0.00%

+17.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.07%

0.00%

+15.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

0.00%

+16.96%

PPH vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPH vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison

PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTEC
Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
2.12%1.78%1.98%2.09%1.55%1.62%1.66%1.77%1.97%1.92%2.43%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, PPH is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PPH is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BTEC.

PPH has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.

PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PPH and 0.42% for BTEC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPH and BTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer