PPFB.DE vs. MC.PA
PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the Gold, while MC.PA (LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, PPFB.DE returned 28.05%/yr vs -13.46%/yr for MC.PA. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
PPFB.DE vs. MC.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly higher than MC.PA's -19.55% return.
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 29.94%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MC.PA
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- 10.80%
- YTD
- -19.55%
- 6M
- -16.91%
- 1Y
- 13.44%
- 3Y*
- -13.46%
- 5Y*
- -3.38%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
PPFB.DE vs. MC.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 2.86% |
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | -19.55% | 3.93% | -11.73% | 9.60% | -4.76% | 10.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPFB.DE and MC.PA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | -0.02 |
The correlation between PPFB.DE and MC.PA shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.11 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPFB.DE vs. MC.PA — Risk / Return Rank
PPFB.DE
MC.PA
PPFB.DE vs. MC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPFB.DE | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.09 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 0.37 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 0.74 | +3.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPFB.DE vs. MC.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum MC.PA drawdown of -54.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and MC.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPFB.DE | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -54.74% | +38.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.60% | -30.65% | +14.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -48.87% | +32.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -39.02% | +24.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -12.08% | +7.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.55% | 15.58% | -9.03% |
Volatility
PPFB.DE vs. MC.PA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) is 5.11%, while LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) has a volatility of 7.96%. This indicates that PPFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MC.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPFB.DE | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 7.96% | -2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.18% | 21.54% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 31.28% | -8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 29.90% | -13.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 27.93% | -11.80% |
Dividends
PPFB.DE vs. MC.PA - Dividend Comparison
PPFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | 2.55% | 2.02% | 2.05% | 1.70% | 1.76% | 0.96% | 0.90% | 1.50% | 2.09% | 1.71% | 1.98% | 2.28% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPFB.DE and MC.PA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and MC.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer