PPFB.DE vs. IGLN.L
PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both Gold funds from iShares - PPFB.DE tracks the Gold while IGLN.L tracks the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PPFB.DE returned 25.83%/yr vs 25.77%/yr for IGLN.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
PPFB.DE vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PPFB.DE is traded in EUR, while IGLN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a -5.76% return, which is significantly lower than IGLN.L's -3.87% return.
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.95%
- YTD
- -5.76%
- 6M
- -6.89%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- 25.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.92%
- YTD
- -3.87%
- 6M
- -7.56%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 25.77%
- 5Y*
- 18.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
PPFB.DE vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | -5.76% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 2.86% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -3.59% | 45.35% | 34.46% | 10.04% | 6.10% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPFB.DE and IGLN.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PPFB.DE and IGLN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPFB.DE vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
PPFB.DE
IGLN.L
PPFB.DE vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPFB.DE | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.05 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | 2.95 | -0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPFB.DE vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -36.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and IGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPFB.DE | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -36.94% | +14.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.04% | -22.28% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.04% | -22.28% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.04% | -22.19% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -13.19% | +8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.95% | 7.96% | -0.01% |
Volatility
PPFB.DE vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) is 8.03%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that PPFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPFB.DE | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.03% | 8.81% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.40% | 22.46% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.22% | 25.17% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 17.00% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 15.13% | +1.27% |
PPFB.DE vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PPFB.DE and IGLN.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PPFB.DE vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPFB.DE nor IGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, PPFB.DE and IGLN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPFB.DE and IGLN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
PPFB.DE tracks Gold, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price.
Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and IGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer