PPEM vs. DIEM
PPEM (Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF -) and DIEM (Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - PPEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index while DIEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PPEM returned 25.58%/yr vs 28.35%/yr for DIEM. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PPEM charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DIEM.
Performance
PPEM vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PPEM having a 31.67% return and DIEM slightly higher at 32.78%.
PPEM
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 31.67%
- 6M
- 34.19%
- 1Y
- 59.91%
- 3Y*
- 25.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIEM
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 12.08%
- YTD
- 32.78%
- 6M
- 35.57%
- 1Y
- 60.54%
- 3Y*
- 28.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- —
PPEM vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PPEM Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - | 31.67% | 35.39% | 7.50% | 0.11% |
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 32.78% | 30.81% | 12.29% | 5.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPEM and DIEM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between PPEM and DIEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
PPEM vs. DIEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PPEM
DIEM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
PPEM
DIEM
Financial Services
PPEM
DIEM
Communication Services
PPEM
DIEM
Consumer Cyclical
PPEM
DIEM
Industrials
PPEM
DIEM
Basic Materials
PPEM
DIEM
Healthcare
PPEM
DIEM
Utilities
PPEM
DIEM
Real Estate
PPEM
DIEM
Energy
PPEM
DIEM
Consumer Defensive
PPEM
DIEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPEM vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank
PPEM
DIEM
PPEM vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - (PPEM) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPEM | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.62 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 4.93 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.82 | 20.34 | -4.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPEM | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 3.35 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.55 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
PPEM vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPEM drawdown since its inception was -18.44%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPEM and DIEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPEM | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.44% | -38.61% | +20.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.28% | -12.33% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.44% | -16.82% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -1.37% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -9.72% | +5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 2.99% | +0.81% |
Volatility
PPEM vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - (PPEM) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) at 8.52%. This indicates that PPEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPEM | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.04% | 8.52% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.75% | 15.91% | +2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.26% | 18.17% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 16.93% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 17.59% | +0.72% |
PPEM vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPEM has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPEM vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison
PPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.14%, more than DIEM's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 2.30% | 2.99% | 4.92% | 4.45% | 6.31% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 5.98% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 0.35% |
PPEM Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - | 49.14% | 6.05% | 3.27% | 1.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, PPEM and DIEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PPEM has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to DIEM (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPEM dropped -18.44% vs DIEM's -38.61%.
On 3-year performance, DIEM leads with 28.35% vs 25.58% for PPEM. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DIEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 28.35% return vs 25.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PPEM.
PPEM has the higher dividend yield at 49.14%, compared with 2.30% for DIEM.
PPEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PPEM and 0.19% for DIEM.
DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPEM and DIEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer