PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPEM vs. DIEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPEM vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - (PPEM) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PPEM having a 31.67% return and DIEM slightly higher at 32.78%.


PPEM

1D
-0.03%
1M
9.45%
YTD
31.67%
6M
34.19%
1Y
59.91%
3Y*
25.58%
5Y*
10Y*

DIEM

1D
-1.37%
1M
12.08%
YTD
32.78%
6M
35.57%
1Y
60.54%
3Y*
28.35%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPEM vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PPEM
Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF -
31.67%35.39%7.50%0.11%
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
32.78%30.81%12.29%5.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PPEM and DIEM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023

0.94

The correlation between PPEM and DIEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

PPEM vs. DIEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PPEM
DIEM

Technology

50.2%
40.3%

Financial Services

16.0%
23.3%

Communication Services

6.9%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
6.7%

Industrials

4.6%
4.7%

Basic Materials

3.8%
4.2%

Healthcare

2.6%
0.6%

Utilities

2.2%
4.1%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.6%

Energy

1.6%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
2.9%

Technology

PPEM
50.2%
DIEM
40.3%

Financial Services

PPEM
16.0%
DIEM
23.3%

Communication Services

PPEM
6.9%
DIEM
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PPEM
5.9%
DIEM
6.7%

Industrials

PPEM
4.6%
DIEM
4.7%

Basic Materials

PPEM
3.8%
DIEM
4.2%

Healthcare

PPEM
2.6%
DIEM
0.6%

Utilities

PPEM
2.2%
DIEM
4.1%

Real Estate

PPEM
1.6%
DIEM
1.6%

Energy

PPEM
1.6%
DIEM
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

PPEM
1.0%
DIEM
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPEM vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPEM
PPEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPEM vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - (PPEM) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPEMDIEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.62

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

4.93

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.82

20.34

-4.51

PPEM vs. DIEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the DIEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPEM and DIEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPEMDIEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

3.35

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.55

+0.63

Drawdowns

PPEM vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPEM drawdown since its inception was -18.44%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPEM and DIEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPEMDIEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.44%

-38.61%

+20.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.28%

-12.33%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.44%

-16.82%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-1.37%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-9.72%

+5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

2.99%

+0.81%

Volatility

PPEM vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - (PPEM) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) at 8.52%. This indicates that PPEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPEMDIEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

8.52%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.75%

15.91%

+2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.26%

18.17%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.31%

16.93%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

17.59%

+0.72%

PPEM vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPEM has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPEM vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison

PPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.14%, more than DIEM's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.30%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%
PPEM
Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF -
49.14%6.05%3.27%1.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PPEM and DIEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PPEM has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to DIEM (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPEM dropped -18.44% vs DIEM's -38.61%.

On 3-year performance, DIEM leads with 28.35% vs 25.58% for PPEM. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DIEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 28.35% return vs 25.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PPEM.

PPEM has the higher dividend yield at 49.14%, compared with 2.30% for DIEM.

PPEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PPEM and 0.19% for DIEM.

DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPEM and DIEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer