PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPEM vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPEM vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - (PPEM) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PPEM

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

IEMG

1D
0.73%
1M
-2.79%
6M
7.82%
YTD
16.38%
1Y
32.88%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
8.84%
ALL TIME*
6.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$833.06M$972.69M$1.09B

PPEM vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PPEM
Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF -
31.88%35.39%7.50%0.19%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
16.38%32.56%6.50%3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PPEM and IEMG is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023

0.91

The correlation between PPEM and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

PPEM vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PPEM
IEMG

Technology

50.9%
43.6%

Financial Services

16.8%
17.3%

Communication Services

8.0%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
7.7%

Basic Materials

3.6%
5.8%

Industrials

3.2%
7.7%

Healthcare

2.5%
3.2%

Energy

2.5%
3.0%

Utilities

2.4%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
2.8%

Technology

PPEM
50.9%
IEMG
43.6%

Financial Services

PPEM
16.8%
IEMG
17.3%

Communication Services

PPEM
8.0%
IEMG
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PPEM
7.7%
IEMG
7.7%

Basic Materials

PPEM
3.6%
IEMG
5.8%

Industrials

PPEM
3.2%
IEMG
7.7%

Healthcare

PPEM
2.5%
IEMG
3.2%

Energy

PPEM
2.5%
IEMG
3.0%

Utilities

PPEM
2.4%
IEMG
1.9%

Real Estate

PPEM
1.5%
IEMG
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

PPEM
1.0%
IEMG
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPEM vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PPEM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PPEM vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - (PPEM) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPEMIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.16

PPEM vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPEM vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPEMIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

Volatility

PPEM vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPEMIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

PPEM vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPEM has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPEM vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

PPEM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.32%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
PPEM
Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF -
49.06%6.05%3.27%1.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPEM and IEMG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PPEM.

PPEM has the higher dividend yield at 49.06%, compared with 2.32% for IEMG.

PPEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: Putnam and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PPEM and 0.09% for IEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPEM and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer