PPBN vs. MU
PPBN (Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. PPBN operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, PPBN returned 14.98%/yr vs 51.33%/yr for MU. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PPBN vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPBN achieves a 33.42% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 188.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PPBN has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 14.98%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 51.33% annualized return.
PPBN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 8.09%
- 6M
- 35.84%
- YTD
- 33.42%
- 1Y
- 86.59%
- 3Y*
- 47.50%
- 5Y*
- 23.63%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.67%
MU
- 1D
- -5.90%
- 1M
- -15.62%
- 6M
- 98.49%
- YTD
- 188.53%
- 1Y
- 685.99%
- 3Y*
- 127.41%
- 5Y*
- 61.18%
- 10Y*
- 51.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.28B | $42.78B | $49.13B | |
| $36.49K | $24.33K | $42.66K |
PPBN vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPBN Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation | 33.42% | 50.25% | 34.52% | 30.22% | -20.05% | 9.84% | -25.75% | 17.81% | -5.54% | 3.59% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 188.53% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPBN and MU is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 1999 | 0.03 |
The correlation between PPBN and MU shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PPBN:
$133.49M
MU:
$929.52B
PPBN:
$17.59
MU:
$44.42
PPBN:
3.41
MU:
18.53
PPBN:
0.12
MU:
0.07
PPBN:
2.16
MU:
10.36
PPBN:
1.38
MU:
9.33
PPBN:
$64.98M
MU:
$90.27B
PPBN:
$53.52M
MU:
$65.51B
PPBN:
$44.13M
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPBN vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
PPBN
MU
PPBN vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation (PPBN) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPBN | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.04 | 1.63 | +2.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.99 | 16.92 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 53.17 | 64.08 | -10.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPBN vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPBN drawdown since its inception was -77.78%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPBN and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPBN | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.78% | -98.25% | +20.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.81% | -39.10% | +33.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.50% | -57.63% | +48.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.05% | -57.63% | +33.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.86% | -57.63% | +9.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -32.17% | +32.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.71% | -58.02% | +31.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 10.31% | -8.68% |
Volatility
PPBN vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation (PPBN) is 5.33%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 31.11%. This indicates that PPBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPBN | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 31.11% | -25.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 67.64% | -59.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 81.13% | -66.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 56.32% | -34.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 51.42% | -27.46% |
Dividends
PPBN vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
PPBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than MU's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PPBN Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation | 1.88% | 2.33% | 3.21% | 3.54% | 3.18% | 2.27% | 2.43% | 1.76% | 1.62% | 1.36% | 1.32% | 1.73% |
Financials
PPBN vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PPBN vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
PPBN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation reported a gross profit of 16.99M and revenue of 19.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.3%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
PPBN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation reported an operating income of 8.05M and revenue of 19.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.4%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
PPBN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation reported a net income of 6.45M and revenue of 19.91M, resulting in a net margin of 32.4%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPBN and MU have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to PPBN (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPBN dropped -77.78% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 5.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPBN and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer