PPA vs. WDGF
PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) and WDGF (WisdomTree Global Defense Fund) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - PPA tracks the SPADE Defense Index while WDGF tracks the WisdomTree Global Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PPA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WDGF.
Performance
PPA vs. WDGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly higher than WDGF's 4.98% return.
PPA
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 29.15%
- 5Y*
- 20.46%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.75%
WDGF
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $32.88M | $30.28M | $35.30M | |
| $40.54K | $43.57K | $158.15K |
PPA vs. WDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 14.49% | 4.95% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 4.98% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPA and WDGF is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPA vs. WDGF — Risk / Return Rank
PPA
WDGF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PPA vs. WDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPA | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.46 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPA vs. WDGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, which is greater than WDGF's maximum drawdown of -18.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and WDGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPA | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.37% | -18.00% | -39.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -11.13% | +7.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -7.01% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.38% | — | — |
Volatility
PPA vs. WDGF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPA | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 22.85% | -1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 22.85% | -4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 22.85% | -2.03% |
PPA vs. WDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than WDGF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPA vs. WDGF - Dividend Comparison
PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than WDGF's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPA and WDGF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDGF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDGF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.
PPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.
PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.45% for WDGF.
Find the right allocation for PPA and WDGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer