PPA vs. WDGF
PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) and WDGF (WisdomTree Global Defense Fund) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - PPA tracks the SPADE Defense Index while WDGF tracks the WisdomTree Global Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PPA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WDGF.
Performance
PPA vs. WDGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly higher than WDGF's 0.72% return.
PPA
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 26.02%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- 17.79%
WDGF
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -4.73%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPA vs. WDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 9.76% | 4.95% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.72% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPA and WDGF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPA vs. WDGF — Risk / Return Rank
PPA
WDGF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PPA vs. WDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPA | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPA vs. WDGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, which is greater than WDGF's maximum drawdown of -14.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and WDGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPA | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.37% | -14.73% | -42.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.37% | -14.73% | +7.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -5.90% | -3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | — | — |
Volatility
PPA vs. WDGF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPA | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.15% | 22.60% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 22.60% | -3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 22.60% | -1.87% |
PPA vs. WDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than WDGF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPA vs. WDGF - Dividend Comparison
PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than WDGF's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.37% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPA and WDGF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDGF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDGF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.
PPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.
PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.45% for WDGF.
Find the right allocation for PPA and WDGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer