PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPA vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPA vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 38.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PPA has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 17.29%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 42.84% annualized return.


PPA

1D
-1.75%
1M
1.72%
YTD
8.88%
6M
13.17%
1Y
25.68%
3Y*
28.96%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
17.29%

TQQQ

1D
-14.28%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
38.79%
6M
30.51%
1Y
98.25%
3Y*
60.11%
5Y*
24.09%
10Y*
42.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPA vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
8.88%37.15%25.28%18.41%9.52%7.09%0.45%39.63%-7.51%30.10%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
38.79%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PPA and TQQQ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.63

The correlation between PPA and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PPA vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PPA
TQQQ

Industrials

90.6%
2.8%

Technology

9.3%
53.8%

Communication Services

0.1%
15.8%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Industrials

PPA
90.6%
TQQQ
2.8%

Technology

PPA
9.3%
TQQQ
53.8%

Communication Services

PPA
0.1%
TQQQ
15.8%

Financial Services

PPA
0.0%
TQQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

PPA

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PPA

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

PPA

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

PPA

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

PPA

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

PPA

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Utilities

PPA

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPA vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPA vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPATQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.83

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.69

9.20

-3.51

PPA vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPA and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPATQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.10

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.36

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.65

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.71

-0.05

Drawdowns

PPA vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPATQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.37%

-81.66%

+24.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-36.97%

+23.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.24%

-58.04%

+42.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

-81.66%

+63.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.92%

-81.66%

+37.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.11%

-16.25%

+8.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.18%

-18.52%

+9.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.73%

11.33%

-6.60%

Volatility

PPA vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) is 6.79%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.42%. This indicates that PPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPATQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

20.42%

-13.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.15%

39.33%

-23.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.21%

49.81%

-30.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.52%

66.79%

-48.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.65%

66.11%

-45.46%

PPA vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPA vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than TQQQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.38%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.43%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPA and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.42%) compared to PPA (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPA dropped -57.37% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 42.84% vs 17.29% for PPA. On fees, PPA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PPA has been the lower-risk option at 6.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 42.84% return vs 17.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PPA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.38% for PPA.

PPA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPA and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer