PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPA vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPA vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPA achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 22.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PPA has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 17.46%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.70% annualized return.


PPA

1D
2.69%
1M
-1.07%
6M
3.22%
YTD
14.49%
1Y
23.96%
3Y*
29.15%
5Y*
20.46%
10Y*
17.46%
ALL TIME*
13.75%

SPMO

1D
1.06%
1M
-3.63%
6M
21.38%
YTD
22.35%
1Y
29.45%
3Y*
38.16%
5Y*
20.19%
10Y*
19.70%
ALL TIME*
19.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$32.88M$30.28M$35.30M
$336.15M$337.86M$350.15M

PPA vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
14.49%37.15%25.28%18.41%9.52%7.09%0.45%39.63%-7.51%30.10%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
22.35%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PPA and SPMO is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.56

The correlation between PPA and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PPA vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PPA
SPMO

Industrials

88.1%
11.2%

Technology

9.9%
53.7%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
1.2%

Communication Services

0.2%
7.4%

Financial Services

0.1%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.2%

Energy

-

3.3%

Healthcare

-

6.9%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Industrials

PPA
88.1%
SPMO
11.2%

Technology

PPA
9.9%
SPMO
53.7%

Basic Materials

PPA
1.9%
SPMO
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PPA
0.3%
SPMO
1.2%

Communication Services

PPA
0.2%
SPMO
7.4%

Financial Services

PPA
0.1%
SPMO
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

PPA

-

SPMO
4.2%

Energy

PPA

-

SPMO
3.3%

Healthcare

PPA

-

SPMO
6.9%

Real Estate

PPA

-

SPMO
1.1%

Utilities

PPA

-

SPMO
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPA vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PPA vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPASPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.89

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.46

6.81

-2.35

PPA vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPA and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPA vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPA drawdown since its inception was -57.37%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPA and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPASPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.37%

-30.95%

-26.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-15.64%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.24%

-20.13%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

-22.74%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.92%

-30.95%

-12.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-10.09%

+6.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-4.62%

-4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.38%

4.33%

+1.05%

Volatility

PPA vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) is 7.01%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that PPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPASPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

10.26%

-3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.04%

21.52%

-4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.03%

23.86%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.80%

20.61%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.82%

20.94%

-0.12%

PPA vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPA vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SPMO's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.36%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.72%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPA and SPMO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to PPA (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPA dropped -57.37% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 19.70% vs 17.46% for PPA. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, PPA has been the lower-risk option at 7.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 19.70% return vs 17.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.36% for PPA.

PPA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while SPMO is Momentum. PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PPA and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPA and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer