POWW vs. GNS
POWW (AMMO, Inc.) and GNS (Genius Group Ltd) are both stocks. POWW operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while GNS operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, POWW returned 0.31%/yr vs -59.37%/yr for GNS. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
POWW vs. GNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWW achieves a 25.15% return, which is significantly higher than GNS's -24.98% return.
POWW
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- 6M
- 31.29%
- YTD
- 25.15%
- 1Y
- 91.07%
- 3Y*
- 0.31%
- 5Y*
- -20.57%
- 10Y*
- 45.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 49.78%
GNS
- 1D
- 182.98%
- 1M
- 119.11%
- 6M
- -16.80%
- YTD
- -24.98%
- 1Y
- -51.30%
- 3Y*
- -59.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -74.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $379.51K | $392.58K | $2.56M | |
POWW AMMO, Inc. | $1.12M | $1.71M | $1.60M |
POWW vs. GNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWW AMMO, Inc. | 25.15% | 55.45% | -47.62% | 21.39% | -59.77% |
GNS Genius Group Ltd | -24.98% | -16.74% | -89.59% | 100.70% | -97.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWW and GNS is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
POWW:
$248.59M
GNS:
$28.41M
POWW:
$51.13M
GNS:
$5.75M
POWW:
$40.97M
GNS:
$1.60M
POWW:
$9.13M
GNS:
-$22.35M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWW vs. GNS — Risk / Return Rank
POWW
GNS
POWW vs. GNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMMO, Inc. (POWW) and Genius Group Ltd (GNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWW | GNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.07 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | -0.67 | +4.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.99 | -1.01 | +11.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWW vs. GNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWW drawdown since its inception was -90.01%, smaller than the maximum GNS drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWW and GNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWW | GNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.01% | -99.95% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.12% | -86.84% | +64.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.62% | -99.35% | +31.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.14% | -99.86% | +21.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.73% | -96.35% | +37.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.19% | 56.98% | -48.79% |
Volatility
POWW vs. GNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMMO, Inc. (POWW) is 11.21%, while Genius Group Ltd (GNS) has a volatility of 106.33%. This indicates that POWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWW | GNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.21% | 106.33% | -95.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.23% | 126.65% | -96.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.10% | 210.64% | -163.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.01% | 233.53% | -176.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,499.74% | 233.53% | +2,266.21% |
Dividends
POWW vs. GNS - Dividend Comparison
POWW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.57%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GNS Genius Group Ltd | 67.57% |
POWW AMMO, Inc. | 0.00% |
Financials
POWW vs. GNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMMO, Inc. and Genius Group Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
POWW and GNS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GNS has higher volatility (106.33%) compared to POWW (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWW dropped -90.01% vs GNS's -99.95%.
POWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWW and GNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer