POWW vs. GNS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AMMO, Inc. (POWW) and Genius Group Ltd (GNS).

Performance

POWW vs. GNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMMO, Inc. (POWW) and Genius Group Ltd (GNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

POWW vs. GNS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
POWW AMMO, Inc.	18.13%	55.45%	-47.62%	21.39%	-59.39%
GNS Genius Group Ltd	-38.56%	-16.74%	-89.59%	100.70%	-98.92%

Fundamentals

EPS POWW : -$0.68 GNS : -$0.65
Total Revenue (TTM) POWW : -$4.92M GNS : $5.75M
Gross Profit (TTM) POWW : $50.58M GNS : $1.60M
EBITDA (TTM) POWW : $2.47M GNS : -$22.35M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWW achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly higher than GNS's -38.56% return.

POWW

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -1.94%
• YTD: 18.13%
• 6M: 39.31%
• 1Y: 47.45%
• 3Y*: 0.84%
• 5Y*: -20.14%
• 10Y*: 44.76%

GNS

• 1D: 8.48%
• 1M: -18.87%
• YTD: -38.56%
• 6M: -64.34%
• 1Y: 62.00%
• 3Y*: -70.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

POWW vs. GNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POWW

POWW Risk / Return Rank: 64
POWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
POWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
POWW Omega Ratio Rank: 62
POWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
POWW Martin Ratio Rank: 59

GNS

GNS Risk / Return Rank: 61
GNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
GNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
GNS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
GNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
GNS Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWW vs. GNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMMO, Inc. (POWW) and Genius Group Ltd (GNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	POWW	GNS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	0.44	+0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	1.93	-0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.20	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	0.60	+0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.91	1.01	+0.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

POWW vs. GNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWW Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the GNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWW and GNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	POWW	GNS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	0.44	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	-0.38	+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between POWW and GNS is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

POWW vs. GNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither POWW nor GNS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

POWW vs. GNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWW drawdown since its inception was -90.01%, smaller than the maximum GNS drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWW and GNS.

Drawdown Indicators

	POWW	GNS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.01%	-99.93%	+9.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.85%	-81.01%	+33.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.37%	-99.88%	+20.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.05%	-96.15%	+38.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.31%	47.62%	-23.31%

Volatility

POWW vs. GNS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMMO, Inc. (POWW) is 14.11%, while Genius Group Ltd (GNS) has a volatility of 30.80%. This indicates that POWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POWW	GNS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.11%	30.80%	-16.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.58%	60.58%	-26.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.48%	141.57%	-85.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.25%	217.34%	-159.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2,541.17%	217.34%	+2,323.83%

Financials