POWW vs. DNA
Compare and contrast key facts about AMMO, Inc. (POWW) and Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: POWW or DNA.
Key characteristics
| POWW | DNA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -42.38% | -87.44% |
| 1Y Return | -51.79% | -83.15% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -43.95% | -75.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.90 | -0.86 |
| Sortino Ratio | -1.26 | -1.94 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.84 | 0.79 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.61 | -0.87 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.68 | -1.37 |
| Ulcer Index | 32.07% | 62.43% |
| Daily Std Dev | 60.30% | 99.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -88.97% | -99.10% |
| Current Drawdown | -87.64% | -98.58% |
Fundamentals
| POWW | DNA | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $143.70M | $471.84M |
| EPS | -$0.21 | -$18.00 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $107.38M | $128.91M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $19.89M | $59.84M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $51.81K | -$420.68M |
Correlation
The correlation between POWW and DNA is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
POWW vs. DNA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, POWW achieves a -42.38% return, which is significantly higher than DNA's -87.44% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
POWW vs. DNA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMMO, Inc. (POWW) and Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
POWW vs. DNA - Dividend Comparison
Neither POWW nor DNA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
POWW vs. DNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWW drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, smaller than the maximum DNA drawdown of -99.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWW and DNA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
POWW vs. DNA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMMO, Inc. (POWW) is 17.13%, while Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA) has a volatility of 20.35%. This indicates that POWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
POWW vs. DNA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMMO, Inc. and Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities