POWW vs. DRS
POWW (AMMO, Inc.) and DRS (Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 3 years, POWW returned 0.31%/yr vs 41.59%/yr for DRS. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
POWW vs. DRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWW achieves a 25.15% return, which is significantly lower than DRS's 35.63% return.
POWW
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- 6M
- 31.29%
- YTD
- 25.15%
- 1Y
- 91.07%
- 3Y*
- 0.31%
- 5Y*
- -20.57%
- 10Y*
- 45.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 49.78%
DRS
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- YTD
- 35.63%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 46.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.28M | $45.66M | $45.85M | |
POWW AMMO, Inc. | $1.12M | $1.71M | $1.60M |
POWW vs. DRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWW AMMO, Inc. | 25.15% | 55.45% | -47.62% | 21.39% | -16.43% |
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 35.63% | 6.56% | 61.23% | 56.81% | 10.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWW and DRS is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2022 | 0.18 |
The correlation between POWW and DRS shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
POWW:
$248.59M
DRS:
$12.28B
POWW:
-$0.04
DRS:
$1.60
POWW:
4.99
DRS:
2.46
POWW:
$51.13M
DRS:
$3.78B
POWW:
$40.97M
DRS:
$934.00M
POWW:
$9.13M
DRS:
$384.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWW vs. DRS — Risk / Return Rank
POWW
DRS
POWW vs. DRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMMO, Inc. (POWW) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWW | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.09 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 0.42 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.99 | 0.91 | +9.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWW vs. DRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWW drawdown since its inception was -90.01%, which is greater than DRS's maximum drawdown of -32.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWW and DRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWW | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.01% | -32.48% | -57.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.12% | -28.16% | +6.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.62% | -32.48% | -35.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.14% | -7.33% | -70.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.73% | -7.32% | -51.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.19% | 12.79% | -4.60% |
Volatility
POWW vs. DRS - Volatility Comparison
AMMO, Inc. (POWW) has a higher volatility of 11.21% compared to Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) at 10.67%. This indicates that POWW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWW | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.21% | 10.67% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.23% | 32.61% | -2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.10% | 39.96% | +7.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.01% | 38.75% | +18.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,499.74% | 38.75% | +2,460.99% |
Dividends
POWW vs. DRS - Dividend Comparison
POWW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 0.78% | 1.06% |
POWW AMMO, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
POWW vs. DRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMMO, Inc. and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
POWW vs. DRS - Profitability Comparison
POWW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AMMO, Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.16M and revenue of 13.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.6%.
DRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 242.00M and revenue of 913.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.5%.
POWW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AMMO, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.48M and revenue of 13.89M, resulting in an operating margin of -25.0%.
DRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 102.00M and revenue of 913.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
POWW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AMMO, Inc. reported a net income of -1.48M and revenue of 13.89M, resulting in a net margin of -10.7%.
DRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 86.00M and revenue of 913.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
POWW and DRS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POWW has higher volatility (11.21%) compared to DRS (10.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWW dropped -90.01% vs DRS's -32.48%.
POWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWW and DRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer