POWW vs. RGR
Compare and contrast key facts about AMMO, Inc. (POWW) and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR).
Performance
POWW vs. RGR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
POWW vs. RGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWW AMMO, Inc. | 17.54% | 55.45% | -47.62% | 21.39% | -68.26% | 65.15% | 233.33% | -67.11% | -4.44% | 6,200.00% |
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 23.04% | -6.13% | -20.91% | -8.04% | -15.41% | 9.30% | 50.28% | -10.14% | -2.84% | 8.65% |
Fundamentals
POWW:
-$0.68
RGR:
-$0.72
POWW:
-$4.92M
RGR:
$395.00M
POWW:
$50.58M
RGR:
$54.20M
POWW:
$2.47M
RGR:
-$1.84M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWW achieves a 17.54% return, which is significantly lower than RGR's 23.04% return. Over the past 10 years, POWW has outperformed RGR with an annualized return of 44.68%, while RGR has yielded a comparatively lower -1.81% annualized return.
POWW
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- 17.54%
- 6M
- 35.81%
- 1Y
- 45.65%
- 3Y*
- 0.67%
- 5Y*
- -20.22%
- 10Y*
- 44.68%
RGR
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 23.04%
- 6M
- -7.46%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- -9.77%
- 5Y*
- -5.88%
- 10Y*
- -1.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWW vs. RGR — Risk / Return Rank
POWW
RGR
POWW vs. RGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMMO, Inc. (POWW) and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POWW | RGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.09 | +0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 0.36 | +1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.06 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 0.08 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | 0.17 | +1.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POWW | RGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.09 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | -0.19 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | -0.05 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.21 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between POWW and RGR is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
POWW vs. RGR - Dividend Comparison
POWW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWW AMMO, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGR Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. | 1.15% | 1.90% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 14.66% | 4.94% | 10.00% | 1.74% | 2.07% | 2.44% | 3.28% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
POWW vs. RGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWW drawdown since its inception was -90.01%, which is greater than RGR's maximum drawdown of -79.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWW and RGR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWW | RGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.01% | -79.69% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.85% | -38.79% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.01% | -60.59% | -29.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.01% | -60.59% | -29.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.47% | -45.04% | -34.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -31.89% | -26.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.31% | 17.87% | +6.44% |
Volatility
POWW vs. RGR - Volatility Comparison
AMMO, Inc. (POWW) has a higher volatility of 14.10% compared to Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) at 10.81%. This indicates that POWW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| POWW | RGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.10% | 10.81% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.67% | 31.36% | +3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.48% | 39.08% | +17.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.30% | 30.38% | +27.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,541.72% | 33.39% | +2,508.33% |
Financials
POWW vs. RGR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMMO, Inc. and Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities