PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POWR vs. RAVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POWR vs. RAVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 18.53% return, which is significantly higher than RAVI's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, POWR has outperformed RAVI with an annualized return of 8.66%, while RAVI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.67% annualized return.


POWR

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
18.53%
6M
15.28%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
12.09%
5Y*
15.16%
10Y*
8.66%

RAVI

1D
0.02%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.92%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWR vs. RAVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF
18.53%10.81%-1.30%3.66%42.54%42.03%-28.30%8.44%-11.74%9.69%
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.53%4.98%5.67%5.55%0.15%-0.04%2.06%3.49%1.65%1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between POWR and RAVI is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

-0.01

The correlation between POWR and RAVI shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POWR vs. RAVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POWR
POWR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
POWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
POWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

RAVI
RAVI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
RAVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAVI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
RAVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAVI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWR vs. RAVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POWRRAVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-21.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

5.39

-4.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

38.66

-33.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

225.58

-213.39

POWR vs. RAVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the RAVI Sharpe Ratio of 11.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWR and RAVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POWRRAVIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

11.02

-9.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

2.49

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

2.09

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

2.03

-1.84

Drawdowns

POWR vs. RAVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than RAVI's maximum drawdown of -3.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and RAVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POWRRAVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.98%

-3.72%

-62.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.98%

-0.12%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.14%

-0.36%

-22.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

-3.28%

-21.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.42%

-3.72%

-59.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

0.00%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.15%

-0.17%

-17.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

0.02%

+2.36%

Volatility

POWR vs. RAVI - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI) at 0.15%. This indicates that POWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POWRRAVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

0.15%

+5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

0.30%

+12.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.65%

0.41%

+16.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

1.41%

+21.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.62%

1.28%

+24.34%

POWR vs. RAVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RAVI's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

POWR vs. RAVI - Dividend Comparison

POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than RAVI's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF
6.67%7.56%4.36%4.16%4.82%3.94%3.96%5.71%3.17%3.11%2.75%3.42%
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.38%4.59%5.34%4.55%1.70%0.90%1.29%2.53%2.22%1.28%0.90%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


POWR and RAVI have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POWR has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to RAVI (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWR dropped -65.98% vs RAVI's -3.72%.

On 10-year performance, POWR leads with 8.66% vs 2.67% for RAVI. On fees, RAVI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RAVI has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, POWR has performed better with a 8.66% return vs 2.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RAVI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWR.

POWR has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 4.38% for RAVI.

POWR is categorized as Utilities Equities, while RAVI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.25% for RAVI.

RAVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.02 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POWR and RAVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer