POWR vs. GLIX
POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and GLIX (Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for GLIX.
Performance
POWR vs. GLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 17.55% return, which is significantly higher than GLIX's 11.86% return.
POWR
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 17.55%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.74%
GLIX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 6M
- 12.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWR vs. GLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 17.55% | -0.98% |
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF | 11.86% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWR and GLIX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWR vs. GLIX — Risk / Return Rank
POWR
GLIX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
POWR vs. GLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWR | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWR vs. GLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than GLIX's maximum drawdown of -7.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and GLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWR | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -7.82% | -58.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -1.55% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.09% | -2.05% | -16.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | — | — |
Volatility
POWR vs. GLIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWR | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 11.88% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 11.88% | +11.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.52% | 11.88% | +13.64% |
POWR vs. GLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWR vs. GLIX - Dividend Comparison
POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than GLIX's 2.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF | 2.03% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 5.48% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWR and GLIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GLIX.
POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 2.03% for GLIX.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.96% for GLIX.
Find the right allocation for POWR and GLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer