POWR vs. FTSD
POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and FTSD (Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POWR is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while FTSD is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, POWR returned 8.66%/yr vs 2.05%/yr for FTSD. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FTSD.
Performance
POWR vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 18.53% return, which is significantly higher than FTSD's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, POWR has outperformed FTSD with an annualized return of 8.66%, while FTSD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.05% annualized return.
POWR
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 18.53%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 15.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
FTSD
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.05%
POWR vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 18.53% | 10.81% | -1.30% | 3.66% | 42.54% | 42.03% | -28.30% | 8.44% | -11.74% | 9.69% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 0.80% | 5.66% | 5.20% | 4.84% | -3.13% | -0.90% | 3.13% | 2.40% | 1.64% | 0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWR and FTSD is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWR vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank
POWR
FTSD
POWR vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POWR | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.69 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 9.59 | -4.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.19 | 38.36 | -26.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POWR | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 3.30 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 1.33 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 1.15 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 1.04 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
POWR vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than FTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and FTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWR | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -5.32% | -60.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.98% | -0.45% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | -0.93% | -22.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | -5.04% | -20.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.42% | -5.32% | -58.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -0.12% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -0.60% | -17.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 0.11% | +2.27% |
Volatility
POWR vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) at 0.51%. This indicates that POWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWR | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 0.51% | +5.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 1.03% | +11.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 1.31% | +15.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 1.85% | +21.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.62% | 1.79% | +23.83% |
POWR vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWR vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison
POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than FTSD's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 4.50% | 4.67% | 4.75% | 4.14% | 1.73% | 1.01% | 1.54% | 2.90% | 2.63% | 2.24% | 1.92% | 1.52% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 6.67% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWR and FTSD have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POWR has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to FTSD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWR dropped -65.98% vs FTSD's -5.32%.
On 10-year performance, POWR leads with 8.66% vs 2.05% for FTSD. On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, POWR has performed better with a 8.66% return vs 2.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWR.
POWR has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 4.50% for FTSD.
POWR is categorized as Utilities Equities, while FTSD is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.25% for FTSD.
FTSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWR and FTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer