POWR vs. BSCQ
POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POWR is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. POWR is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, POWR returned 14.70%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for BSCQ. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. POWR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
POWR vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWR achieves a 17.85% return, which is significantly higher than BSCQ's 1.68% return.
POWR
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 17.85%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 23.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.53%
- 10Y*
- —
POWR vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 17.85% | 10.81% | -1.30% | 3.66% | 42.54% | 42.03% | -28.30% | 8.44% | -11.74% | 9.69% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.68% | 5.02% | 4.86% | 5.71% | -8.31% | -1.68% | 9.41% | 13.94% | -2.40% | 5.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWR and BSCQ is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | -0.04 |
The correlation between POWR and BSCQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWR vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
POWR
BSCQ
POWR vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWR | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -13.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 3.51 | -2.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 41.89 | -38.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | 183.04 | -173.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWR vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWR drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWR and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWR | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -16.50% | -49.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -0.10% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | -1.13% | -22.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | -13.02% | -12.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -0.03% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.09% | -2.83% | -15.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 0.02% | +2.42% |
Volatility
POWR vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.12%. This indicates that POWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWR | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 0.12% | +6.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 0.41% | +12.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.83% | 0.61% | +16.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.07% | 3.29% | +19.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.52% | 4.75% | +20.77% |
POWR vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWR vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
POWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, more than BSCQ's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 5.47% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWR and BSCQ have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POWR has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to BSCQ (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWR dropped -65.98% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.
On 5-year performance, POWR leads with 14.70% vs 1.53% for BSCQ. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, POWR has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 1.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWR.
POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 4.11% for BSCQ.
POWR is categorized as Utilities Equities, while BSCQ is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWR and 0.10% for BSCQ.
BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.10 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWR and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer