POWL vs. LUG.TO
POWL (Powell Industries, Inc.) and LUG.TO (Lundin Gold Inc.) are both stocks. POWL operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while LUG.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, POWL returned 40.56%/yr vs 31.55%/yr for LUG.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
POWL vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
POWL is traded in USD, while LUG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LUG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWL achieves a 177.61% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -27.93% return. Over the past 10 years, POWL has outperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of 40.56%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 31.55% annualized return.
POWL
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 177.61%
- 6M
- 162.55%
- 1Y
- 358.62%
- 3Y*
- 146.47%
- 5Y*
- 94.19%
- 10Y*
- 40.56%
LUG.TO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -16.07%
- YTD
- -27.93%
- 6M
- -25.81%
- 1Y
- 14.81%
- 3Y*
- 77.02%
- 5Y*
- 48.80%
- 10Y*
- 31.55%
POWL vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 177.61% | 44.49% | 152.21% | 155.62% | 24.34% | 3.60% | -37.60% | 101.58% | -9.92% | -24.00% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | -27.93% | 309.94% | 76.65% | 32.70% | 22.82% | -4.62% | 34.40% | 74.11% | 1.61% | -7.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWL and LUG.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.06 |
The correlation between POWL and LUG.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
POWL:
$10.77B
LUG.TO:
CA$18.65B
POWL:
$5.12
LUG.TO:
$3.77
POWL:
57.59
LUG.TO:
14.57
POWL:
0.09
LUG.TO:
0.19
POWL:
9.51
LUG.TO:
6.66
POWL:
15.19
LUG.TO:
9.79
POWL:
$1.13B
LUG.TO:
$2.00B
POWL:
$340.78M
LUG.TO:
$1.41B
POWL:
$236.11M
LUG.TO:
$1.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWL vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
POWL
LUG.TO
POWL vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWL | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.09 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.71 | 0.38 | +11.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.97 | 1.03 | +35.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWL vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWL drawdown since its inception was -73.10%, smaller than the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -95.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWL and LUG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWL | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.10% | -95.13% | +22.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.88% | -39.12% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.76% | -39.12% | -16.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.76% | -43.37% | -12.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | -46.50% | -22.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -36.18% | +27.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.09% | -71.98% | +35.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.76% | 14.44% | -4.68% |
Volatility
POWL vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) has a higher volatility of 19.86% compared to Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) at 17.97%. This indicates that POWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWL | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.86% | 17.97% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.83% | 41.95% | +2.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.91% | 56.02% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.36% | 46.84% | +17.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.84% | 43.77% | +11.07% |
Dividends
POWL vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison
POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than LUG.TO's 6.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 6.79% | 3.35% | 2.69% | 3.26% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.34% | 0.48% | 1.19% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.53% | 2.12% | 4.16% | 3.63% | 2.67% | 4.00% |
Financials
POWL vs. LUG.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Powell Industries, Inc. and Lundin Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
POWL vs. LUG.TO - Profitability Comparison
POWL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.94M and revenue of 296.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.
LUG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.70M and revenue of 567.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.
POWL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.58M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.
LUG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 391.03M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.9%.
POWL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.89M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
LUG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 273.33M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
POWL and LUG.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for POWL and LUG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer