POWA vs. USPX
POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - POWA tracks the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index while USPX tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, POWA returned 10.17%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for USPX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POWA charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for USPX.
Performance
POWA vs. USPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly lower than USPX's 7.94% return. Over the past 10 years, POWA has underperformed USPX with an annualized return of 10.17%, while USPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.60% annualized return.
POWA
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- -3.46%
- 6M
- -4.44%
- 1Y
- 2.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
USPX
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- 1Y
- 23.21%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
POWA vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | -3.46% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 24.93% | 7.61% | 27.98% | -3.96% | 21.52% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 7.94% | 17.78% | 24.97% | 27.07% | -18.88% | 19.53% | 9.72% | 26.60% | -7.78% | 23.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWA and USPX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016 | 0.75 |
The correlation between POWA and USPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
POWA vs. USPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
POWA
USPX
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
POWA
USPX
Industrials
POWA
USPX
Healthcare
POWA
USPX
Consumer Defensive
POWA
USPX
Consumer Cyclical
POWA
USPX
Financial Services
POWA
USPX
Real Estate
POWA
USPX
Communication Services
POWA
USPX
Basic Materials
POWA
-
USPX
Energy
POWA
-
USPX
Utilities
POWA
-
USPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWA vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank
POWA
USPX
POWA vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWA | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.33 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 2.55 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | 11.19 | -10.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWA vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than USPX's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and USPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWA | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -31.21% | -16.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -9.15% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -19.21% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | -24.60% | +6.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | -31.21% | -5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.56% | -3.17% | -4.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -4.43% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 2.08% | +1.81% |
Volatility
POWA vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) is 3.15%, while Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that POWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWA | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 4.89% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 10.06% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 12.74% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 16.28% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 15.96% | +0.09% |
POWA vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWA vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison
POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than USPX's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | 0.97% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 0.83% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.35% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 2.60% | 4.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWA and USPX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USPX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to POWA (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs USPX's -31.21%.
On 10-year performance, USPX leads with 12.60% vs 10.17% for POWA. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, POWA has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USPX has performed better with a 12.60% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWA.
POWA has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.83% for USPX.
POWA tracks Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while USPX tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.03% for USPX.
USPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWA and USPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer