POWA vs. SOXQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ).
POWA and SOXQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. POWA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index. It was launched on Dec 15, 2006. SOXQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. It was launched on Jun 11, 2021. Both POWA and SOXQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
POWA vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
POWA vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | -4.22% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 12.38% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 7.17% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a -4.22% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 7.17% return.
POWA
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -7.55%
- YTD
- -4.22%
- 6M
- -3.94%
- 1Y
- 5.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 6.19%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 19.39%
- 1Y
- 78.41%
- 3Y*
- 33.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
POWA vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
POWA vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
POWA
SOXQ
POWA vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POWA | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 1.97 | -1.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 2.58 | -1.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.37 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 4.47 | -3.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 16.40 | -13.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POWA | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 1.97 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.58 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between POWA and SOXQ is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
POWA vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than SOXQ's 0.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | 0.98% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
POWA vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and SOXQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWA | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -46.01% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -17.44% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.29% | -10.36% | +2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -13.38% | +7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 4.75% | -2.05% |
Volatility
POWA vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) is 4.03%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.15%. This indicates that POWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| POWA | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 13.15% | -9.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 26.20% | -17.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 40.06% | -24.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 36.09% | -22.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 36.09% | -20.08% |