POWA vs. SOXQ
POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - POWA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, POWA returned 10.86%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POWA charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
POWA vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
POWA
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWA vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | -2.29% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 12.38% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWA and SOXQ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between POWA and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
POWA vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
POWA
SOXQ
Technology
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
POWA
SOXQ
Industrials
POWA
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
POWA
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
POWA
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
POWA
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
POWA
SOXQ
Real Estate
POWA
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
POWA
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
POWA
-
SOXQ
-
Energy
POWA
-
SOXQ
-
Utilities
POWA
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWA vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
POWA
SOXQ
POWA vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POWA | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.36 | 5.43 | -5.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 5.22 | -4.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.72 | -0.66 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 11.73 | -11.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 45.01 | -43.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POWA | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 5.43 | -5.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.98 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
POWA vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWA | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -46.01% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -15.59% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -39.36% | +24.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.44% | 0.00% | -6.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -12.96% | +6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 4.06% | -0.47% |
Volatility
POWA vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) is 3.12%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that POWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWA | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 13.44% | -10.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 26.70% | -17.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 33.78% | -22.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 36.38% | -22.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 36.38% | -20.33% |
POWA vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
POWA vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF | 0.96% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWA and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to POWA (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 10.86% for POWA. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, POWA has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWA.
POWA has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
POWA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. POWA tracks Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWA and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer