POWA vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - POWA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, POWA returned 10.28%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for DBO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. POWA charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

POWA vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POWA achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Over the past 10 years, POWA has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 10.28%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.

POWA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: -2.29%
• 6M: -2.55%
• 1Y: 4.21%
• 3Y*: 10.86%
• 5Y*: 7.41%
• 10Y*: 10.28%

DBO

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 84.75%
• 6M: 81.10%
• 1Y: 80.26%
• 3Y*: 21.86%
• 5Y*: 15.98%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWA vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	-2.29%	11.71%	13.18%	10.58%	-7.67%	24.93%	7.61%	27.98%	-3.96%	21.52%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	84.75%	-11.71%	7.85%	-4.44%	13.04%	60.74%	-20.99%	28.05%	-15.22%	4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between POWA and DBO is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007	0.25

The correlation between POWA and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

POWA vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	POWA	DBO
Technology	25.3%	-
Industrials	19.0%	-
Healthcare	18.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	16.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	14.8%	-
Financial Services	2.3%	116.0%
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Communication Services	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

POWA vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POWA

POWA Risk / Return Rank: 14
POWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
POWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
POWA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
POWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
POWA Martin Ratio Rank: 15

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 65
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWA vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	POWA	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	2.34	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	2.94	-2.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.38	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.43	4.44	-4.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.18	9.02	-7.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

POWA vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWA and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	POWA	DBO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	2.34	-1.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.50	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.36	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.02	+0.52

Drawdowns

POWA vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	POWA	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.91%	-90.18%	+42.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	-18.19%	+8.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.00%	-28.20%	+13.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.75%	-37.68%	+19.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.53%	-61.69%	+25.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.44%	-51.38%	+44.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.24%	-62.25%	+56.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	8.92%	-5.33%

Volatility

POWA vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) is 3.12%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that POWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POWA	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	12.61%	-9.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.80%	28.20%	-19.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.73%	34.46%	-22.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.92%	32.29%	-18.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.05%	31.78%	-15.73%

POWA vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

POWA vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	1.90%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	0.96%	0.94%	0.79%	1.60%	1.48%	1.06%	1.34%	1.16%	1.39%	1.63%	2.18%	3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POWA and DBO in my portfolio?

POWA and DBO have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POWA or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to POWA (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, POWA or DBO?

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.37% vs 10.28% for POWA. On fees, POWA is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, POWA has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, POWA or DBO?

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, POWA or DBO?

POWA is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POWA or DBO?

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.96% for POWA.

What is the main difference between POWA and DBO?

POWA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. POWA tracks Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.