POWA vs. CVSE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

POWA (Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF) and CVSE (Calvert US Select Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. POWA is passively managed, while CVSE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, POWA returned 10.86%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for CVSE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POWA charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for CVSE.

Performance

POWA vs. CVSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

POWA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: -2.29%
• 6M: -2.55%
• 1Y: 4.21%
• 3Y*: 10.86%
• 5Y*: 7.41%
• 10Y*: 10.28%

CVSE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 8.06%
• 3Y*: 13.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POWA vs. CVSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	-2.29%	11.71%	13.18%	6.90%
CVSE Calvert US Select Equity ETF	0.00%	10.14%	19.11%	13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between POWA and CVSE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between POWA and CVSE has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

POWA vs. CVSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	POWA	CVSE
Technology	25.3%	39.5%
Industrials	19.0%	11.3%
Healthcare	18.4%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	16.1%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	14.8%	7.0%
Financial Services	2.3%	16.3%
Real Estate	2.2%	3.5%
Communication Services	2.0%	5.1%
Basic Materials	-	2.7%
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	2.5%

Return for Risk

POWA vs. CVSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POWA

POWA Risk / Return Rank: 14
POWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
POWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
POWA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
POWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
POWA Martin Ratio Rank: 15

CVSE

CVSE Risk / Return Rank: 46
CVSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CVSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CVSE Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CVSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CVSE Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POWA vs. CVSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) and Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	POWA	CVSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	1.28	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	1.90	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.40	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.43	2.66	-2.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.18	5.71	-4.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

POWA vs. CVSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the CVSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POWA and CVSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	POWA	CVSE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	1.28	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.92	-0.38

Drawdowns

POWA vs. CVSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POWA drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than CVSE's maximum drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWA and CVSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	POWA	CVSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.91%	-20.29%	-27.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	-3.08%	-6.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.00%	-20.29%	+5.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.44%	-1.68%	-4.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.24%	-2.69%	-3.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	1.42%	+2.17%

Volatility

POWA vs. CVSE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that POWA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POWA	CVSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	0.00%	+3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.80%	0.00%	+8.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.73%	6.49%	+5.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.92%	13.87%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.05%	13.87%	+2.18%

POWA vs. CVSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

POWA has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CVSE's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

POWA vs. CVSE - Dividend Comparison

POWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than CVSE's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CVSE Calvert US Select Equity ETF	0.59%	0.81%	1.05%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POWA Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF	0.96%	0.94%	0.79%	1.60%	1.48%	1.06%	1.34%	1.16%	1.39%	1.63%	2.18%	3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POWA and CVSE in my portfolio?

POWA and CVSE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POWA or CVSE?

POWA has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to CVSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWA dropped -47.91% vs CVSE's -20.29%.

Which ETF is better, POWA or CVSE?

On 3-year performance, CVSE leads with 13.34% vs 10.86% for POWA. On fees, CVSE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CVSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, POWA or CVSE?

Over the 3-year period, CVSE has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, POWA or CVSE?

CVSE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for POWA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POWA or CVSE?

POWA has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.59% for CVSE.

What is the main difference between POWA and CVSE?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Calvert. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for POWA and 0.29% for CVSE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.