PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POW.TO vs. NNN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

POW.TO vs. NNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) and National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

POW.TO is traded in CAD, while NNN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NNN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POW.TO achieves a 19.95% return, which is significantly lower than NNN's 23.39% return. Over the past 10 years, POW.TO has outperformed NNN with an annualized return of 17.87%, while NNN has yielded a comparatively lower 5.76% annualized return.


POW.TO

1D
1.29%
1M
8.60%
YTD
19.95%
6M
20.68%
1Y
72.49%
3Y*
42.38%
5Y*
22.99%
10Y*
17.87%

NNN

1D
1.23%
1M
8.50%
YTD
23.39%
6M
20.12%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
5.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POW.TO vs. NNN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POW.TO
Power Corporation of Canada
19.95%69.73%25.05%26.19%-19.21%49.93%-4.91%43.97%-20.10%12.78%
NNN
National Retail Properties, Inc.
23.39%-1.89%8.40%-2.96%6.33%23.02%-21.21%10.05%27.73%-4.91%

Correlation

The correlation between POW.TO and NNN is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006

0.21

The correlation between POW.TO and NNN shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

POW.TO:

CA$55.32B

NNN:

$8.83B

EPS

POW.TO:

CA$4.29

NNN:

$2.05

PE Ratio

POW.TO:

20.21

NNN:

22.68

PS Ratio

POW.TO:

1.60

NNN:

9.39

PB Ratio

POW.TO:

3.96

NNN:

2.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

POW.TO:

CA$34.88B

NNN:

$935.78M

Gross Profit (TTM)

POW.TO:

CA$30.59B

NNN:

$761.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

POW.TO:

CA$6.51B

NNN:

$870.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POW.TO vs. NNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POW.TO
POW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
POW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
POW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
POW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
POW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NNN
NNN Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NNN Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NNN Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POW.TO vs. NNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) and National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


POW.TONNNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.19

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.14

2.01

+3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.64

5.37

+10.28

POW.TO vs. NNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.97, which is higher than the NNN Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POW.TO and NNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POW.TO vs. NNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POW.TO drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than NNN's maximum drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW.TO and NNN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POW.TONNNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-51.94%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-9.28%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-19.29%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.09%

-24.12%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.16%

-51.90%

+2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.14%

-11.91%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

3.47%

+1.23%

Volatility

POW.TO vs. NNN - Volatility Comparison

Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to National Retail Properties, Inc. (NNN) at 5.51%. This indicates that POW.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POW.TONNNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

5.51%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.47%

11.75%

+3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

17.20%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

20.42%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.07%

28.52%

-5.45%

Dividends

POW.TO vs. NNN - Dividend Comparison

POW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than NNN's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NNN
National Retail Properties, Inc.
5.15%5.96%5.61%5.17%4.72%4.37%5.06%3.79%4.02%4.31%4.03%4.27%
POW.TO
Power Corporation of Canada
2.89%3.36%5.02%5.54%6.22%4.40%7.51%4.77%6.13%4.36%4.38%4.23%

Financials

POW.TO vs. NNN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Power Corporation of Canada and National Retail Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B-5.00B0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
6.60B
240.42M
(POW.TO) Total Revenue
(NNN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. POW.TO values in CAD, NNN values in USD

POW.TO vs. NNN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Power Corporation of Canada and National Retail Properties, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
80.5%
95.9%
Portfolio components
POW.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Power Corporation of Canada reported a gross profit of 5.31B and revenue of 6.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.5%.

NNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Retail Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 230.63M and revenue of 240.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

POW.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Power Corporation of Canada reported an operating income of 1.76B and revenue of 6.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.7%.

NNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Retail Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.65M and revenue of 240.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.0%.

POW.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Power Corporation of Canada reported a net income of 840.00M and revenue of 6.60B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.

NNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Retail Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 93.95M and revenue of 240.42M, resulting in a net margin of 39.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


POW.TO and NNN have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POW.TO and NNN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer