POW.TO vs. BAM.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO).
Performance
POW.TO vs. BAM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
POW.TO vs. BAM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW.TO Power Corporation of Canada | -8.20% | 69.74% | 25.05% | 26.19% | -4.69% |
BAM.TO Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | -13.08% | -4.84% | 51.69% | 42.59% | -12.88% |
Fundamentals
POW.TO:
CA$4.79
BAM.TO:
CA$2.29
POW.TO:
13.99
BAM.TO:
27.01
POW.TO:
1.36
BAM.TO:
13.70
POW.TO:
CA$31.86B
BAM.TO:
CA$4.90B
POW.TO:
CA$11.64B
BAM.TO:
CA$4.64B
POW.TO:
CA$6.56B
BAM.TO:
CA$2.89B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POW.TO achieves a -8.20% return, which is significantly higher than BAM.TO's -13.08% return.
POW.TO
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- -8.20%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 35.68%
- 3Y*
- 30.71%
- 5Y*
- 21.08%
- 10Y*
- 14.40%
BAM.TO
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- -13.08%
- 6M
- -20.43%
- 1Y
- -8.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POW.TO vs. BAM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
POW.TO
BAM.TO
POW.TO vs. BAM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POW.TO | BAM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | -0.25 | +2.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | -0.14 | +2.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.98 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | -0.26 | +2.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.62 | -0.59 | +8.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POW.TO | BAM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | -0.25 | +2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.48 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between POW.TO and BAM.TO is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
POW.TO vs. BAM.TO - Dividend Comparison
POW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than BAM.TO's 4.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW.TO Power Corporation of Canada | 2.75% | 3.36% | 5.02% | 5.54% | 6.22% | 4.40% | 7.51% | 4.77% | 6.13% | 4.36% | 4.38% | 4.23% |
BAM.TO Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | 4.05% | 3.41% | 2.67% | 3.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
POW.TO vs. BAM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POW.TO drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than BAM.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW.TO and BAM.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| POW.TO | BAM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -30.79% | -31.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.33% | -30.31% | +15.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.56% | -27.15% | +17.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.65% | -8.41% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.82% | 13.35% | -8.53% |
Volatility
POW.TO vs. BAM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) have volatilities of 7.31% and 7.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| POW.TO | BAM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 7.42% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.86% | 22.14% | -8.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.74% | 32.35% | -13.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 30.03% | -13.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.10% | 30.03% | -6.93% |
Financials
POW.TO vs. BAM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Power Corporation of Canada and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities