PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POW.TO vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

POW.TO vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

POW.TO is traded in CAD, while NEM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NEM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POW.TO achieves a 19.95% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's 2.86% return. Over the past 10 years, POW.TO has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 17.87%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 14.78% annualized return.


POW.TO

1D
1.29%
1M
8.60%
YTD
19.95%
6M
20.68%
1Y
72.49%
3Y*
42.38%
5Y*
22.99%
10Y*
17.87%

NEM

1D
2.89%
1M
-11.95%
YTD
2.86%
6M
4.04%
1Y
79.79%
3Y*
38.17%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POW.TO vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POW.TO
Power Corporation of Canada
19.95%69.73%25.05%26.19%-19.21%49.93%-4.91%43.97%-20.10%12.78%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
2.86%160.36%-0.03%-10.93%-15.75%7.35%36.96%25.14%1.74%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between POW.TO and NEM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006

0.07

The correlation between POW.TO and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (10 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

POW.TO:

CA$4.29

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

POW.TO:

20.21

NEM:

15.82

PS Ratio

POW.TO:

1.60

NEM:

4.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

POW.TO:

CA$34.88B

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

POW.TO:

CA$30.59B

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

POW.TO:

CA$6.51B

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POW.TO vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POW.TO
POW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
POW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
POW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
POW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
POW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POW.TO vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


POW.TONEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.30

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.14

3.11

+2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.64

8.30

+7.34

POW.TO vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.97, which is higher than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POW.TO and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POW.TO vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POW.TO drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW.TO and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POW.TONEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-70.02%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-27.50%

+13.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-33.96%

+18.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.09%

-59.76%

+33.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.16%

-59.76%

+10.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-21.57%

+21.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.14%

-29.16%

+16.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

10.30%

-5.60%

Volatility

POW.TO vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) is 5.85%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 15.86%. This indicates that POW.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POW.TONEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

15.86%

-10.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.47%

37.54%

-22.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

47.43%

-28.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

38.16%

-21.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.07%

36.11%

-13.04%

Dividends

POW.TO vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

POW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than NEM's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.02%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%
POW.TO
Power Corporation of Canada
2.89%3.36%5.02%5.54%6.22%4.40%7.51%4.77%6.13%4.36%4.38%4.23%

Financials

POW.TO vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Power Corporation of Canada and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B-5.00B0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
6.60B
0
(POW.TO) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. POW.TO values in CAD, NEM values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


POW.TO and NEM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POW.TO and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer