PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POSIX vs. PLTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POSIX vs. PLTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POSIX achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly lower than PLTHX's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, POSIX has underperformed PLTHX with an annualized return of 4.10%, while PLTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.09% annualized return.


POSIX

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
6.90%
6M
6.37%
1Y
9.48%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
4.10%

PLTHX

1D
0.51%
1M
5.53%
YTD
11.70%
6M
12.29%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
12.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POSIX vs. PLTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POSIX
Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund
6.90%7.57%0.67%10.87%-26.74%23.45%-3.91%24.53%-3.35%14.73%
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
11.70%19.91%17.18%20.28%-18.52%20.05%16.11%26.46%-9.93%21.32%

Correlation

The correlation between POSIX and PLTHX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between POSIX and PLTHX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POSIX vs. PLTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POSIX
POSIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
POSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
POSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
POSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
POSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTHX
PLTHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PLTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POSIX vs. PLTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POSIXPLTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.44

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

3.34

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.25

15.30

-12.05

POSIX vs. PLTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the PLTHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POSIX and PLTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POSIXPLTHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

2.41

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.68

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.76

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.69

-0.52

Drawdowns

POSIX vs. PLTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POSIX drawdown since its inception was -68.45%, which is greater than PLTHX's maximum drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POSIX and PLTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POSIXPLTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.45%

-33.26%

-35.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.97%

-8.60%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-16.64%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.15%

-25.49%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.70%

-33.26%

-8.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.95%

0.00%

-5.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.93%

-4.81%

-9.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

1.87%

+0.84%

Volatility

POSIX vs. PLTHX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) at 3.42%. This indicates that POSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POSIXPLTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

3.42%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

9.46%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

11.93%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

15.50%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

15.97%

+1.02%

POSIX vs. PLTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

POSIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTHX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

POSIX vs. PLTHX - Dividend Comparison

POSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than PLTHX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
3.91%4.37%4.30%2.76%7.91%3.84%2.91%3.67%3.47%2.37%2.20%1.65%
POSIX
Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund
2.47%2.64%2.57%2.63%1.12%2.40%1.13%6.32%3.81%4.16%3.70%4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


POSIX and PLTHX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POSIX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to PLTHX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POSIX dropped -68.45% vs PLTHX's -33.26%.

PLTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POSIX and PLTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer