POSIX vs. PHTNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

POSIX (Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund) and PHTNX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund) are both mutual funds - POSIX is a REIT fund managed by Principal, while PHTNX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, POSIX returned 4.10%/yr vs 8.77%/yr for PHTNX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POSIX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PHTNX.

Performance

POSIX vs. PHTNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund (PHTNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with POSIX having a 6.90% return and PHTNX slightly higher at 7.16%. Over the past 10 years, POSIX has underperformed PHTNX with an annualized return of 4.10%, while PHTNX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.77% annualized return.

POSIX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -1.83%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 6M: 6.37%
• 1Y: 9.48%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: 0.31%
• 10Y*: 4.10%

PHTNX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 3.35%
• YTD: 7.16%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 18.37%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 8.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POSIX vs. PHTNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
POSIX Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund	6.90%	7.57%	0.67%	10.87%	-26.74%	23.45%	-3.91%	24.53%	-3.35%	14.73%
PHTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund	7.16%	14.41%	11.06%	14.92%	-16.76%	13.88%	14.74%	20.92%	-7.30%	16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between POSIX and PHTNX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014	0.73

The correlation between POSIX and PHTNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

POSIX vs. PHTNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POSIX

POSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9
POSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
POSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
POSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
POSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
POSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

PHTNX

PHTNX Risk / Return Rank: 72
PHTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PHTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
PHTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
PHTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
PHTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POSIX vs. PHTNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund (PHTNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	POSIX	PHTNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	2.45	-1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	3.52	-2.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.47	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	3.23	-2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.25	14.66	-11.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

POSIX vs. PHTNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the PHTNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POSIX and PHTNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	POSIX	PHTNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	2.45	-1.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.63	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.78	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.72	-0.54

Drawdowns

POSIX vs. PHTNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POSIX drawdown since its inception was -68.45%, which is greater than PHTNX's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POSIX and PHTNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	POSIX	PHTNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.45%	-24.52%	-43.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.97%	-5.79%	-4.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.02%	-10.07%	-7.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.15%	-22.06%	-12.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.70%	-24.52%	-17.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.95%	0.00%	-5.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.93%	-3.98%	-9.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	1.27%	+1.44%

Volatility

POSIX vs. PHTNX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund (PHTNX) at 2.43%. This indicates that POSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHTNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POSIX	PHTNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	2.43%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	6.14%	+2.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.82%	7.65%	+4.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.30%	10.51%	+5.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	11.23%	+5.76%

POSIX vs. PHTNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

POSIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than PHTNX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

POSIX vs. PHTNX - Dividend Comparison

POSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than PHTNX's 4.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PHTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund	4.31%	4.62%	3.71%	3.42%	8.05%	5.40%	4.44%	3.70%	3.79%	2.52%	2.28%	1.68%
POSIX Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund	2.47%	2.64%	2.57%	2.63%	1.12%	2.40%	1.13%	6.32%	3.81%	4.16%	3.70%	4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POSIX and PHTNX in my portfolio?

POSIX and PHTNX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POSIX or PHTNX?

POSIX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to PHTNX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POSIX dropped -68.45% vs PHTNX's -24.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PHTNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.