PHTNX vs. FRIMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund (PHTNX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX).
PHTNX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014. FRIMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2007.
Performance
PHTNX vs. FRIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PHTNX vs. FRIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund | -2.64% | 14.41% | 11.06% | 14.92% | -16.76% | 13.88% | 14.74% | 20.92% | -7.30% | 16.81% |
FRIMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I | -0.51% | 9.94% | 4.30% | 8.06% | -11.66% | 2.78% | 8.57% | 10.57% | -1.82% | 7.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHTNX achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly lower than FRIMX's -0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PHTNX has outperformed FRIMX with an annualized return of 7.95%, while FRIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.92% annualized return.
PHTNX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -0.56%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
FRIMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- 3.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PHTNX vs. FRIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHTNX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FRIMX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PHTNX vs. FRIMX — Risk / Return Rank
PHTNX
FRIMX
PHTNX vs. FRIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund (PHTNX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHTNX | FRIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.56 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 2.17 | -0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.08 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 8.41 | -1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHTNX | FRIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.56 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.46 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.88 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.53 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between PHTNX and FRIMX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PHTNX vs. FRIMX - Dividend Comparison
PHTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than FRIMX's 3.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund | 4.74% | 4.62% | 3.71% | 3.42% | 8.05% | 5.40% | 4.44% | 3.70% | 3.79% | 2.52% | 2.28% | 1.68% |
FRIMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I | 3.15% | 3.11% | 3.01% | 2.82% | 4.52% | 3.54% | 2.41% | 2.56% | 4.67% | 8.56% | 1.67% | 1.68% |
Drawdowns
PHTNX vs. FRIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHTNX drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum FRIMX drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTNX and FRIMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHTNX | FRIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.52% | -33.73% | +9.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.69% | -3.44% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | -16.12% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.52% | -16.12% | -8.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.79% | -3.19% | -2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -3.74% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 0.85% | +0.74% |
Volatility
PHTNX vs. FRIMX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund (PHTNX) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) at 1.95%. This indicates that PHTNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PHTNX | FRIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 1.95% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.68% | 2.86% | +2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.04% | 4.59% | +5.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.49% | 5.21% | +5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.20% | 4.47% | +6.73% |