Correlation
The correlation between PHTNX and QQQ is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
PHTNX vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund (PHTNX) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
PHTNX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PHTNX or QQQ.
Performance
PHTNX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
PHTNX:
0.84
QQQ:
0.62
PHTNX:
1.14
QQQ:
0.92
PHTNX:
1.16
QQQ:
1.13
PHTNX:
0.83
QQQ:
0.60
PHTNX:
3.57
QQQ:
1.94
PHTNX:
2.33%
QQQ:
7.02%
PHTNX:
10.83%
QQQ:
25.59%
PHTNX:
-24.52%
QQQ:
-82.98%
PHTNX:
-0.29%
QQQ:
-3.64%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHTNX achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PHTNX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 6.76%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.
PHTNX
3.19%
3.04%
0.68%
8.32%
7.34%
8.24%
6.76%
QQQ
1.69%
7.77%
2.15%
15.88%
19.78%
18.08%
17.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PHTNX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHTNX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PHTNX vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PHTNX
QQQ
PHTNX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund (PHTNX) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
PHTNX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
PHTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than QQQ's 0.58% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund | 3.04% | 3.13% | 3.42% | 8.05% | 5.40% | 4.44% | 3.71% | 3.79% | 2.52% | 2.29% | 1.68% | 4.83% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.58% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% |
Drawdowns
PHTNX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHTNX drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTNX and QQQ.
Loading data...
Volatility
PHTNX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2030 Fund (PHTNX) is 2.52%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that PHTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...