POOL vs. XLK
POOL (Pool Corporation) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, POOL returned 9.44%/yr vs 25.48%/yr for XLK. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
POOL vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POOL achieves a -13.68% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.25% return. Over the past 10 years, POOL has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 9.44%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.48% annualized return.
POOL
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- -13.68%
- 6M
- -14.35%
- 1Y
- -32.24%
- 3Y*
- -16.58%
- 5Y*
- -14.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
XLK
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 28.25%
- 6M
- 26.51%
- 1Y
- 52.47%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 21.34%
- 10Y*
- 25.48%
POOL vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POOL Pool Corporation | -13.68% | -31.81% | -13.39% | 33.51% | -46.03% | 52.98% | 76.95% | 44.50% | 15.97% | 25.78% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.25% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between POOL and XLK is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between POOL and XLK has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POOL vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
POOL
XLK
POOL vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pool Corporation (POOL) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POOL | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.38 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 3.31 | -4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 10.56 | -11.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POOL vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POOL drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POOL and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POOL | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.71% | -82.05% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.86% | -15.92% | -30.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.77% | -25.66% | -31.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.85% | -33.56% | -34.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.85% | -33.56% | -34.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.02% | -6.96% | -57.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.40% | -34.90% | +16.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.83% | 4.98% | +21.85% |
Volatility
POOL vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pool Corporation (POOL) is 9.78%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 12.51%. This indicates that POOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POOL | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | 12.51% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.37% | 19.70% | +7.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.99% | 23.48% | +10.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.08% | 25.37% | +8.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.64% | 24.71% | +6.93% |
Dividends
POOL vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
POOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than XLK's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POOL Pool Corporation | 2.59% | 2.16% | 1.38% | 1.08% | 1.26% | 0.53% | 0.61% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.24% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POOL and XLK have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to POOL (9.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POOL dropped -75.71% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POOL and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer