POOL vs. CAMT
POOL (Pool Corporation) and CAMT (Camtek Ltd.) are both stocks. POOL operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical), while CAMT operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, POOL returned 7.60%/yr vs 48.82%/yr for CAMT. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
POOL vs. CAMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POOL achieves a -17.72% return, which is significantly lower than CAMT's 24.56% return. Over the past 10 years, POOL has underperformed CAMT with an annualized return of 7.60%, while CAMT has yielded a comparatively higher 48.82% annualized return.
POOL
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- 6M
- -25.93%
- YTD
- -17.72%
- 1Y
- -38.49%
- 3Y*
- -20.44%
- 5Y*
- -16.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.08%
CAMT
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -9.60%
- YTD
- 24.56%
- 1Y
- 38.70%
- 3Y*
- 41.97%
- 5Y*
- 29.20%
- 10Y*
- 48.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd. | $71.36M | $73.47M | $86.04M |
POOL Pool Corporation | $220.41M | $177.95M | $201.61M |
POOL vs. CAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POOL Pool Corporation | -17.72% | -31.81% | -13.39% | 33.51% | -46.03% | 52.98% | 76.95% | 44.50% | 15.97% | 25.78% |
CAMT Camtek Ltd. | 24.56% | 31.66% | 18.33% | 215.94% | -52.30% | 110.13% | 102.31% | 63.19% | 20.41% | 77.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between POOL and CAMT is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.19 |
The correlation between POOL and CAMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
POOL:
$6.77B
CAMT:
$6.18B
POOL:
$10.88
CAMT:
$0.98
POOL:
17.07
CAMT:
135.24
POOL:
1.27
CAMT:
13.02
POOL:
5.35
CAMT:
9.99
POOL:
$5.39B
CAMT:
$499.09M
POOL:
$1.60B
CAMT:
$250.68M
POOL:
$605.03M
CAMT:
$122.77M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POOL vs. CAMT — Risk / Return Rank
POOL
CAMT
POOL vs. CAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pool Corporation (POOL) and Camtek Ltd. (CAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POOL | CAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.15 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 1.05 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 2.82 | -4.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POOL vs. CAMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POOL drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, smaller than the maximum CAMT drawdown of -97.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POOL and CAMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POOL | CAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.71% | -97.71% | +22.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.86% | -38.80% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.77% | -63.16% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.85% | -63.16% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.85% | -63.16% | -4.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.70% | -36.15% | -29.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.55% | -55.55% | +37.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.57% | 14.47% | +15.10% |
Volatility
POOL vs. CAMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pool Corporation (POOL) is 11.43%, while Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) has a volatility of 24.11%. This indicates that POOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POOL | CAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.43% | 24.11% | -12.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.08% | 56.30% | -27.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.85% | 69.56% | -34.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.45% | 57.22% | -22.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.85% | 52.78% | -20.93% |
Dividends
POOL vs. CAMT - Dividend Comparison
POOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, while CAMT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 2.07% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POOL Pool Corporation | 2.72% | 2.16% | 1.38% | 1.08% | 1.26% | 0.53% | 0.61% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.24% |
Financials
POOL vs. CAMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pool Corporation and Camtek Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
POOL vs. CAMT - Profitability Comparison
POOL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pool Corporation reported a gross profit of 540.76M and revenue of 1.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.
CAMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Camtek Ltd. reported a gross profit of 60.93M and revenue of 121.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.
POOL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pool Corporation reported an operating income of 267.68M and revenue of 1.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.
CAMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Camtek Ltd. reported an operating income of 27.27M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.
POOL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Pool Corporation reported a net income of 188.09M and revenue of 1.82B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
CAMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Camtek Ltd. reported a net income of 31.65M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
POOL and CAMT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAMT has higher volatility (24.11%) compared to POOL (11.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POOL dropped -75.71% vs CAMT's -97.71%.
CAMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POOL and CAMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer