POOL vs. CAMT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pool Corporation (POOL) and Camtek Ltd (CAMT).

Performance

POOL vs. CAMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pool Corporation (POOL) and Camtek Ltd (CAMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

POOL vs. CAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
POOL Pool Corporation	-11.02%	-31.81%	-13.39%	33.51%	-46.03%	52.98%	76.95%	44.50%	15.97%	25.78%
CAMT Camtek Ltd	42.56%	31.66%	18.33%	215.94%	-52.30%	110.13%	102.31%	63.19%	20.41%	77.72%

Fundamentals

Market Cap POOL : $7.46B CAMT : $7.58B
EPS POOL : $10.91 CAMT : $1.05
PE Ratio POOL : 18.54 CAMT : 144.52
PS Ratio POOL : 1.42 CAMT : 14.78
PB Ratio POOL : 6.30 CAMT : 12.28
Total Revenue (TTM) POOL : $5.29B CAMT : $496.07M
Gross Profit (TTM) POOL : $1.57B CAMT : $250.32M
EBITDA (TTM) POOL : $616.77M CAMT : $128.20M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POOL achieves a -11.02% return, which is significantly lower than CAMT's 42.56% return. Over the past 10 years, POOL has underperformed CAMT with an annualized return of 9.92%, while CAMT has yielded a comparatively higher 55.02% annualized return.

POOL

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -10.41%
• YTD: -11.02%
• 6M: -34.03%
• 1Y: -35.24%
• 3Y*: -14.84%
• 5Y*: -9.33%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

CAMT

• 1D: 4.95%
• 1M: -9.43%
• YTD: 42.56%
• 6M: 44.32%
• 1Y: 158.59%
• 3Y*: 75.83%
• 5Y*: 36.15%
• 10Y*: 55.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

POOL vs. CAMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POOL

POOL Risk / Return Rank: 6
POOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
POOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
POOL Omega Ratio Rank: 7
POOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
POOL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

CAMT

CAMT Risk / Return Rank: 93
CAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POOL vs. CAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pool Corporation (POOL) and Camtek Ltd (CAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	POOL	CAMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.03	2.58	-3.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.47	2.96	-4.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.37	-0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	5.95	-6.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.78	16.29	-18.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

POOL vs. CAMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POOL Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the CAMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POOL and CAMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	POOL	CAMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.03	2.58	-3.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28	0.67	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	1.07	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.20	+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between POOL and CAMT is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

POOL vs. CAMT - Dividend Comparison

POOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while CAMT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
POOL Pool Corporation	2.47%	2.16%	1.38%	1.08%	1.26%	0.53%	0.61%	0.99%	1.16%	1.10%	1.14%	1.24%
CAMT Camtek Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.57%	2.07%	2.45%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

POOL vs. CAMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POOL drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, smaller than the maximum CAMT drawdown of -97.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POOL and CAMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	POOL	CAMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.71%	-97.71%	+22.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.78%	-26.38%	-13.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.57%	-63.16%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.57%	-63.16%	-0.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.91%	-15.44%	-47.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.07%	-56.07%	+38.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.36%	9.64%	+9.72%

Volatility

POOL vs. CAMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pool Corporation (POOL) is 6.56%, while Camtek Ltd (CAMT) has a volatility of 22.81%. This indicates that POOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POOL	CAMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.56%	22.81%	-16.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.10%	43.96%	-19.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.42%	61.81%	-27.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.62%	54.64%	-21.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.24%	51.53%	-20.29%

Financials

POOL vs. CAMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pool Corporation and Camtek Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

POOL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pool Corporation reported a gross profit of 295.75M and revenue of 982.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.1%.

CAMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a gross profit of 64.10M and revenue of 128.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.0%.

POOL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pool Corporation reported an operating income of 52.01M and revenue of 982.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

CAMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camtek Ltd reported an operating income of 31.68M and revenue of 128.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.

POOL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pool Corporation reported a net income of 31.59M and revenue of 982.21M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.

CAMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a net income of 35.90M and revenue of 128.12M, resulting in a net margin of 28.0%.