PONCX vs. EWA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PONCX (PIMCO Income Fund Class C) and EWA (iShares MSCI-Australia ETF) are both funds - PONCX is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while EWA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia Index. PONCX is actively managed, while EWA is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PONCX returned 3.45%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for EWA. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PONCX charges 1.69%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWA.

Performance

PONCX vs. EWA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Income Fund Class C (PONCX) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PONCX achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than EWA's 11.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PONCX has underperformed EWA with an annualized return of 3.45%, while EWA has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.

PONCX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 0.83%
• 1Y: 7.15%
• 3Y*: 6.32%
• 5Y*: 2.22%
• 10Y*: 3.45%

EWA

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 11.26%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 15.43%
• 3Y*: 12.60%
• 5Y*: 5.51%
• 10Y*: 8.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PONCX vs. EWA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PONCX PIMCO Income Fund Class C	0.51%	9.80%	3.81%	7.61%	-9.86%	1.44%	4.63%	6.85%	-0.56%	7.39%
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF	11.26%	13.35%	1.60%	13.81%	-5.92%	8.93%	8.29%	22.45%	-12.04%	19.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PONCX and EWA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2007	0.17

Over the past year, PONCX and EWA have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PONCX vs. EWA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PONCX

PONCX Risk / Return Rank: 34
PONCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
PONCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PONCX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PONCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
PONCX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

EWA

EWA Risk / Return Rank: 27
EWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
EWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EWA Omega Ratio Rank: 24
EWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
EWA Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PONCX vs. EWA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Fund Class C (PONCX) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PONCX	EWA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	0.92	+0.87
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	1.36	+1.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.17	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	1.55	+0.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.51	4.43	+2.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PONCX vs. EWA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PONCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the EWA Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PONCX and EWA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PONCX	EWA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	0.92	+0.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.28	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.37	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	0.29	+1.02

Drawdowns

PONCX vs. EWA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PONCX drawdown since its inception was -14.17%, smaller than the maximum EWA drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PONCX and EWA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PONCX	EWA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.17%	-66.98%	+52.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.69%	-10.01%	+6.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.12%	-21.91%	+17.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.17%	-24.87%	+10.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.17%	-45.54%	+31.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-3.70%	+2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-11.33%	+9.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	3.49%	-2.39%

Volatility

PONCX vs. EWA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Income Fund Class C (PONCX) is 1.65%, while iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that PONCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PONCX	EWA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.65%	5.46%	-3.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.19%	13.98%	-10.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.03%	16.87%	-12.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.75%	19.73%	-14.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.14%	22.61%	-18.47%

PONCX vs. EWA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PONCX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than EWA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PONCX vs. EWA - Dividend Comparison

PONCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than EWA's 2.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF	2.89%	3.21%	3.71%	3.72%	5.28%	5.08%	2.02%	3.97%	6.11%	4.44%	4.03%	5.48%
PONCX PIMCO Income Fund Class C	4.68%	4.88%	4.70%	4.66%	4.06%	2.86%	3.77%	4.67%	4.46%	4.24%	4.41%	6.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PONCX and EWA in my portfolio?

PONCX and EWA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PONCX or EWA?

EWA has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to PONCX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PONCX dropped -14.17% vs EWA's -66.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PONCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.