PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PONAX vs. BNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PONAX vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PONAX achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than BNDX's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PONAX has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 4.22%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.69% annualized return.


PONAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.83%
1Y
6.76%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
4.22%

BNDX

1D
0.58%
1M
1.01%
YTD
0.85%
6M
0.99%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*
1.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PONAX vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
0.18%10.63%5.02%8.96%-9.34%2.21%5.40%7.65%0.21%8.19%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
0.85%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PONAX and BNDX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.39

Over the past year, PONAX and BNDX have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PONAX vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PONAX
PONAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PONAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PONAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PONAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PONAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PONAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PONAX vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PONAXBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.10

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

0.68

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

1.90

+4.54

PONAX vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PONAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PONAX and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PONAX vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PONAX drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, smaller than the maximum BNDX drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PONAX and BNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PONAXBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.64%

-16.23%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.69%

-2.93%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.90%

-2.93%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.64%

-15.86%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.64%

-16.23%

+2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-1.18%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-3.10%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

1.05%

+0.05%

Volatility

PONAX vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.50%. This indicates that PONAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PONAXBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

1.50%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

2.96%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

3.47%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

4.89%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.22%

4.10%

+0.12%

PONAX vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PONAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

PONAX vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

PONAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than BNDX's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.48%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
5.46%5.61%5.86%5.86%4.66%3.62%4.48%5.42%5.24%4.97%5.13%7.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


PONAX and BNDX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PONAX has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to BNDX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PONAX dropped -13.64% vs BNDX's -16.23%.

PONAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PONAX and BNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer