PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POGSX vs. LOGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POGSX vs. LOGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) and Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POGSX achieves a 15.77% return, which is significantly higher than LOGSX's -1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, POGSX has outperformed LOGSX with an annualized return of 13.77%, while LOGSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.49% annualized return.


POGSX

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.48%
YTD
15.77%
6M
17.55%
1Y
37.21%
3Y*
26.76%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
13.77%

LOGSX

1D
-1.70%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
-1.54%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
6.02%
10Y*
6.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POGSX vs. LOGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POGSX
Pin Oak Equity
15.77%27.41%18.99%27.16%-25.10%21.42%10.60%27.72%-6.15%15.14%
LOGSX
Live Oak Health Sciences Fund
-1.95%19.63%0.16%1.21%3.71%17.59%6.01%18.98%-3.84%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between POGSX and LOGSX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2001

0.70

The correlation between POGSX and LOGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POGSX vs. LOGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POGSX
POGSX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
POGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
POGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
POGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
POGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

LOGSX
LOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POGSX vs. LOGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) and Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POGSXLOGSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

1.05

+1.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.26

1.57

+2.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.19

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

1.84

+2.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.04

4.49

+12.55

POGSX vs. LOGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POGSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the LOGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POGSX and LOGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POGSXLOGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

1.05

+1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.43

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.40

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.43

-0.12

Drawdowns

POGSX vs. LOGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POGSX drawdown since its inception was -89.46%, which is greater than LOGSX's maximum drawdown of -45.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POGSX and LOGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POGSXLOGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.46%

-45.85%

-43.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-7.65%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.76%

-14.33%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-15.03%

-14.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.05%

-27.28%

-5.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-7.09%

+6.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.73%

-7.61%

-29.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

3.13%

-0.91%

Volatility

POGSX vs. LOGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) is 2.35%, while Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that POGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POGSXLOGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

3.57%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

10.02%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

14.02%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

14.18%

+3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.54%

16.13%

+2.41%

POGSX vs. LOGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

POGSX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than LOGSX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

POGSX vs. LOGSX - Dividend Comparison

POGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.41%, more than LOGSX's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOGSX
Live Oak Health Sciences Fund
2.11%2.07%2.64%6.28%0.55%7.02%7.04%0.85%15.20%6.45%2.10%15.52%
POGSX
Pin Oak Equity
16.41%8.85%17.87%8.21%0.15%10.93%4.60%3.22%2.94%1.79%2.03%3.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


POGSX and LOGSX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOGSX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to POGSX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POGSX dropped -89.46% vs LOGSX's -45.85%.

POGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POGSX and LOGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer