LOGSX vs. FACDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX).
LOGSX is managed by Oak Associates. It was launched on Jun 28, 2001. FACDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
LOGSX vs. FACDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LOGSX vs. FACDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGSX Live Oak Health Sciences Fund | -1.53% | 19.63% | 0.16% | 1.21% | 3.71% | 17.59% | 6.01% | 18.98% | -3.84% | 13.42% |
FACDX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A | -9.65% | 14.19% | 3.97% | 3.81% | -13.07% | 11.25% | 21.07% | 27.89% | 7.20% | 24.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGSX achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly higher than FACDX's -9.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGSX has underperformed FACDX with an annualized return of 7.11%, while FACDX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.31% annualized return.
LOGSX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- -1.53%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 12.96%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.11%
FACDX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -9.65%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LOGSX vs. FACDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGSX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FACDX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LOGSX vs. FACDX — Risk / Return Rank
LOGSX
FACDX
LOGSX vs. FACDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGSX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.21 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 0.42 | +0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 0.21 | +1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 0.63 | +4.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGSX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.21 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.07 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.56 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGSX and FACDX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LOGSX vs. FACDX - Dividend Comparison
LOGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than FACDX's 14.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGSX Live Oak Health Sciences Fund | 2.10% | 2.07% | 2.64% | 6.28% | 0.55% | 7.02% | 7.04% | 0.85% | 15.20% | 6.45% | 2.10% | 15.52% |
FACDX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A | 14.70% | 13.28% | 12.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.24% | 5.94% | 0.32% | 5.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.66% |
Drawdowns
LOGSX vs. FACDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGSX drawdown since its inception was -45.85%, roughly equal to the maximum FACDX drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGSX and FACDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGSX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.85% | -44.55% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.65% | -13.43% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.03% | -29.35% | +14.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.28% | -29.35% | +2.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.68% | -13.43% | +6.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -9.36% | +1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 4.42% | -1.81% |
Volatility
LOGSX vs. FACDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) is 4.71%, while Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that LOGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FACDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LOGSX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 5.59% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 11.00% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.35% | 18.38% | -2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 17.68% | -3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 18.75% | -2.63% |