POCT vs. QMAR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) and QMAR (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March) are both exchange-traded funds - POCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index, while QMAR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust. POCT is passively managed, while QMAR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, POCT returned 9.89%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for QMAR. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. POCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMAR.

Performance

POCT vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POCT achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 11.91% return.

POCT

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 0.82%
• 6M: 5.73%
• YTD: 6.44%
• 1Y: 12.30%
• 3Y*: 11.51%
• 5Y*: 9.89%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.85%

QMAR

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.04%
• 6M: 11.24%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 1Y: 18.52%
• 3Y*: 14.85%
• 5Y*: 11.10%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	$1.31M	$1.79M	$3.31M
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	$319.00K	$316.44K	$452.98K

POCT vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	6.44%	11.00%	9.54%	20.12%	-1.26%	7.76%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	11.91%	10.89%	16.11%	35.47%	-16.56%	12.87%

Correlation

The correlation between POCT and QMAR is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2021	0.82

The correlation between POCT and QMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

POCT vs. QMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	POCT	QMAR
Technology	37.9%	60.2%
Financial Services	11.7%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.0%	13.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	10.9%
Healthcare	9.1%	3.6%
Industrials	8.4%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	6.5%
Energy	3.0%	0.5%
Utilities	2.3%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.0%

Return for Risk

POCT vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

POCT

POCT Risk / Return Rank: 82
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

QMAR

QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 95
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

POCT vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POCT	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	2.55	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	3.83	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.55	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	5.54	-2.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.23	26.00	-12.77

POCT vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POCT and QMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

POCT vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, smaller than the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and QMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	POCT	QMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.80%	-19.83%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.40%	-3.21%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.22%	-15.91%	+5.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.22%	-19.83%	+9.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.20%	+1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-3.22%	+1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.68%	+0.20%

Volatility

POCT vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) is 1.48%, while FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that POCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POCT	QMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.48%	2.60%	-1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.98%	6.16%	-1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.26%	6.99%	-0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.00%	14.04%	-6.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.15%	13.75%	-3.60%

POCT vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

POCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

POCT vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither POCT nor QMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.21%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POCT and QMAR in my portfolio?

POCT and QMAR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POCT or QMAR?

QMAR has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to POCT (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCT dropped -18.80% vs QMAR's -19.83%.

Which ETF is better, POCT or QMAR?

On 5-year performance, QMAR leads with 11.10% vs 9.89% for POCT. On fees, POCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, POCT or QMAR?

Over the 5-year period, QMAR has performed better with a 11.10% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, POCT or QMAR?

POCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POCT or QMAR?

POCT and QMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between POCT and QMAR?

POCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QMAR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for POCT and 0.90% for QMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.