PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POCT vs. PJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

POCT vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

POCT vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
-1.84%11.00%9.54%20.12%-1.26%9.46%10.40%12.80%-7.12%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
-1.00%12.78%13.76%19.87%-2.08%7.20%7.51%12.47%-6.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POCT achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than PJUL's -1.00% return.


POCT

1D
1.72%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
-1.84%
6M
0.02%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*

PJUL

1D
1.63%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-1.00%
6M
0.81%
1Y
14.38%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


POCT vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both POCT and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

POCT vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POCT vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POCTPJULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.43

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

2.17

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

2.10

-0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.51

11.87

-3.37

POCT vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the PJUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POCT and PJUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POCTPJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.43

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

1.10

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.83

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between POCT and PJUL is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

POCT vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither POCT nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Drawdowns

POCT vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, roughly equal to the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and PJUL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


POCTPJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-18.17%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-6.99%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

-10.69%

+0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-2.07%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-1.50%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

1.24%

+0.09%

Volatility

POCT vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) at 2.90%. This indicates that POCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


POCTPJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

2.90%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.13%

4.16%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

10.09%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.90%

8.58%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.31%

10.12%

+0.19%