POCT vs. IJUL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) and IJUL (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - POCT tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index while IJUL tracks the MSCI EAFE Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, POCT returned 9.82%/yr vs 7.77%/yr for IJUL. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IJUL.

Performance

POCT vs. IJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POCT achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than IJUL's 5.68% return.

POCT

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 6M: 5.92%
• 1Y: 14.36%
• 3Y*: 12.17%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: —

IJUL

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 5.68%
• 6M: 7.34%
• 1Y: 13.33%
• 3Y*: 11.04%
• 5Y*: 7.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POCT vs. IJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	5.33%	11.00%	9.54%	20.12%	-1.26%	9.46%	10.40%	2.65%
IJUL Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July	5.68%	20.98%	2.12%	13.77%	-2.77%	2.80%	0.42%	3.35%

Correlation

The correlation between POCT and IJUL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019	0.64

The correlation between POCT and IJUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

POCT vs. IJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	POCT	IJUL
Technology	36.2%	10.3%
Financial Services	11.9%	24.7%
Communication Services	10.9%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	7.7%
Healthcare	8.4%	10.6%
Industrials	8.1%	19.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	6.7%
Energy	3.5%	4.0%
Utilities	2.3%	4.0%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	5.9%

Return for Risk

POCT vs. IJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POCT

POCT Risk / Return Rank: 75
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 83

IJUL

IJUL Risk / Return Rank: 52
IJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
IJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
IJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POCT vs. IJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	POCT	IJUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.67	+0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	2.41	+0.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.32	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	2.50	+0.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.84	9.93	+6.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

POCT vs. IJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the IJUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POCT and IJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	POCT	IJUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	1.67	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.24	0.79	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.58	+0.29

Drawdowns

POCT vs. IJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, smaller than the maximum IJUL drawdown of -21.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and IJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	POCT	IJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.80%	-21.09%	+2.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.40%	-5.35%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.22%	-8.27%	-1.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.22%	-14.59%	+4.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.13%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-2.55%	+1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	1.35%	-0.49%

Volatility

POCT vs. IJUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) is 0.94%, while Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) has a volatility of 1.90%. This indicates that POCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POCT	IJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.94%	1.90%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.77%	6.09%	-1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.17%	8.03%	-1.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.94%	9.85%	-1.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.22%	11.08%	-0.86%

POCT vs. IJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

POCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IJUL's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

POCT vs. IJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither POCT nor IJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IJUL Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.99%
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POCT and IJUL in my portfolio?

POCT and IJUL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POCT or IJUL?

IJUL has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to POCT (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCT dropped -18.80% vs IJUL's -21.09%.

Which ETF is better, POCT or IJUL?

On 5-year performance, POCT leads with 9.82% vs 7.77% for IJUL. On fees, POCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, POCT or IJUL?

Over the 5-year period, POCT has performed better with a 9.82% return vs 7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, POCT or IJUL?

POCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, POCT or IJUL?

POCT and IJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between POCT and IJUL?

POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index, while IJUL tracks MSCI EAFE Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for POCT and 0.85% for IJUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

POCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.