PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJUL vs. EOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IJUL vs. EOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IJUL vs. EOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IJUL
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July
1.41%20.98%2.12%13.77%-2.77%1.06%
EOCT
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October
1.54%22.03%9.66%6.26%-10.75%-0.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJUL achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than EOCT's 1.54% return.


IJUL

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
1.41%
6M
3.48%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*

EOCT

1D
0.62%
1M
-2.72%
YTD
1.54%
6M
3.45%
1Y
20.63%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IJUL vs. EOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than EOCT's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IJUL vs. EOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJUL
IJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

EOCT
EOCT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJUL vs. EOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJULEOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

1.97

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

2.76

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.40

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.15

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.37

12.96

-1.59

IJUL vs. EOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the EOCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJUL and EOCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJULEOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.97

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.50

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between IJUL and EOCT is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IJUL vs. EOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither IJUL nor EOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
IJUL
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.99%
EOCT
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IJUL vs. EOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.09%, roughly equal to the maximum EOCT drawdown of -20.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJUL and EOCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IJULEOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.09%

-20.35%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.72%

-6.57%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-3.63%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-5.88%

+3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

1.60%

-0.13%

Volatility

IJUL vs. EOCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - July (IJUL) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IJULEOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

4.43%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

6.63%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

10.49%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.75%

11.41%

-1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.14%

11.41%

-0.27%