PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNSAX vs. VVSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PNSAX vs. VVSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) and VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNSAX achieves a 24.71% return, which is significantly higher than VVSGX's 17.05% return.


PNSAX

1D
0.29%
1M
4.23%
YTD
24.71%
6M
21.30%
1Y
36.20%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
16.85%

VVSGX

1D
0.85%
1M
4.66%
YTD
17.05%
6M
13.65%
1Y
26.79%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNSAX vs. VVSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PNSAX
Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund
24.71%8.91%22.98%22.87%-28.10%9.73%
VVSGX
VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund
17.05%8.99%10.85%14.20%-32.21%-3.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PNSAX and VVSGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021

0.94

The correlation between PNSAX and VVSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNSAX vs. VVSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNSAX
PNSAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PNSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PNSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VVSGX
VVSGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VVSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VVSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNSAX vs. VVSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) and VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PNSAXVVSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.22

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.04

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.51

7.66

+0.85

PNSAX vs. VVSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the VVSGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNSAX and VVSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PNSAX vs. VVSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNSAX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than VVSGX's maximum drawdown of -44.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNSAX and VVSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PNSAXVVSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.47%

-44.74%

-24.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.00%

-12.47%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.25%

-25.74%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.77%

-44.74%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-2.31%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-24.57%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

3.32%

+0.71%

Volatility

PNSAX vs. VVSGX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) has a higher volatility of 9.16% compared to VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) at 7.36%. This indicates that PNSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VVSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PNSAXVVSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.16%

7.36%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.50%

16.06%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.99%

20.86%

+3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.49%

25.11%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

25.06%

-1.39%

PNSAX vs. VVSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNSAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VVSGX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

PNSAX vs. VVSGX - Dividend Comparison

PNSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than VVSGX's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PNSAX
Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund
0.34%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.27%4.87%1.93%1.88%0.00%0.00%
VVSGX
VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund
2.12%0.00%0.00%7.74%10.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PNSAX and VVSGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PNSAX has higher volatility (9.16%) compared to VVSGX (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNSAX dropped -69.47% vs VVSGX's -44.74%.

PNSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PNSAX and VVSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer