PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNOPX vs. VMGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PNOPX vs. VMGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNOPX achieves a 3.92% return, which is significantly lower than VMGAX's 4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PNOPX has underperformed VMGAX with an annualized return of 14.66%, while VMGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.27% annualized return.


PNOPX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.42%
6M
4.90%
YTD
3.92%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
14.66%
ALL TIME*
12.00%

VMGAX

1D
1.14%
1M
-0.93%
6M
6.38%
YTD
4.77%
1Y
16.42%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
18.27%
ALL TIME*
13.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PNOPX vs. VMGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
3.92%10.93%22.97%26.23%-22.86%23.44%28.57%35.86%-0.90%29.07%
VMGAX
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.77%20.73%32.98%51.57%-33.55%28.50%41.02%37.54%-2.86%29.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PNOPX and VMGAX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.95

The correlation between PNOPX and VMGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNOPX vs. VMGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PNOPX
PNOPX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PNOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PNOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VMGAX
VMGAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VMGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VMGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PNOPX vs. VMGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PNOPXVMGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

0.83

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

2.60

+0.87

PNOPX vs. VMGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNOPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the VMGAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNOPX and VMGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PNOPX vs. VMGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNOPX drawdown since its inception was -74.15%, which is greater than VMGAX's maximum drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNOPX and VMGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PNOPXVMGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.15%

-47.97%

-26.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-16.78%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.90%

-23.45%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.13%

-36.03%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.29%

-36.03%

+5.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-6.12%

+5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.93%

-7.42%

-16.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

5.35%

-1.80%

Volatility

PNOPX vs. VMGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) is 3.85%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMGAX) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that PNOPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PNOPXVMGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

5.83%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

14.69%

-3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

18.26%

-4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

23.00%

-5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

22.02%

-3.87%

PNOPX vs. VMGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNOPX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VMGAX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PNOPX vs. VMGAX - Dividend Comparison

PNOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.79%, more than VMGAX's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
10.79%11.22%9.25%2.96%8.38%11.69%7.41%7.14%20.24%4.91%0.00%12.64%
VMGAX
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.35%0.36%0.44%0.51%0.71%0.42%0.65%0.86%1.13%1.23%1.53%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PNOPX and VMGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMGAX has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to PNOPX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNOPX dropped -74.15% vs VMGAX's -47.97%.

PNOPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PNOPX and VMGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer