PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNOPX vs. CHASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PNOPX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNOPX achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 24.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PNOPX has underperformed CHASX with an annualized return of 15.25%, while CHASX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.48% annualized return.


PNOPX

1D
-1.85%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
1.57%
6M
0.52%
1Y
13.31%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
15.25%

CHASX

1D
-1.90%
1M
2.67%
YTD
24.18%
6M
22.01%
1Y
45.60%
3Y*
40.76%
5Y*
21.98%
10Y*
20.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNOPX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
1.57%10.93%22.97%26.23%-22.86%23.44%28.57%35.86%-0.90%29.07%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
24.18%20.61%64.71%25.91%-20.41%22.32%18.27%42.63%-3.96%24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PNOPX and CHASX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 1997

0.89

The correlation between PNOPX and CHASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNOPX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNOPX
PNOPX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PNOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PNOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

CHASX
CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNOPX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PNOPXCHASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.44

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

4.86

-3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

20.09

-15.88

PNOPX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNOPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNOPX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PNOPX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNOPX drawdown since its inception was -74.15%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNOPX and CHASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PNOPXCHASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.15%

-45.94%

-28.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-9.90%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.90%

-23.40%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.13%

-24.63%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.29%

-30.40%

+0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-2.10%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-9.14%

-14.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

2.39%

+1.13%

Volatility

PNOPX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) is 5.52%, while Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that PNOPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PNOPXCHASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

6.89%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

14.38%

-3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

18.33%

-5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

20.38%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

19.95%

-1.78%

PNOPX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNOPX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

PNOPX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

PNOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than CHASX's 7.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
7.35%9.12%36.67%5.80%5.49%20.15%7.83%22.82%12.92%11.92%9.14%10.24%
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
11.04%11.22%9.25%2.96%8.38%11.69%7.41%7.14%20.24%4.91%0.00%12.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PNOPX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHASX has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to PNOPX (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNOPX dropped -74.15% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PNOPX and CHASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer