PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNNT vs. K
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PNNT vs. K - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and Kellogg Company (K). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PNNT

1D
1.58%
1M
-8.53%
YTD
-29.84%
6M
-27.65%
1Y
-33.82%
3Y*
0.38%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*
7.07%

K

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNNT vs. K - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
-29.84%-2.96%16.56%37.25%-8.90%61.71%-17.99%14.30%2.05%-0.65%
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%-6.78%26.08%-13.32%-4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between PNNT and K is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007

0.20

The correlation between PNNT and K shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PNNT:

$302.41

K:

$3.65

PE Ratio

PNNT:

0.01

K:

22.87

PEG Ratio

PNNT:

0.00

K:

3.84

PS Ratio

PNNT:

2.20

K:

2.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

PNNT:

$85.01M

K:

$12.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PNNT:

$24.12M

K:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

PNNT:

$16.10M

K:

$2.25B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNNT vs. K — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNNT
PNNT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PNNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNNT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PNNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNNT Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

K

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNNT vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PNNTKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.65

PNNT vs. K - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PNNT vs. K - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PNNTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.58%

Volatility

PNNT vs. K - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PNNTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.76%

Dividends

PNNT vs. K - Dividend Comparison

PNNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.94%, while K has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
24.94%16.11%12.85%11.65%10.43%6.93%11.71%11.03%11.30%10.42%14.62%18.12%

Financials

PNNT vs. K - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PennantPark Investment Corporation and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
27.25M
3.26B
(PNNT) Total Revenue
(K) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PNNT and K have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PNNT and K

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer