PNGAX vs. PHSTX
PNGAX (Putnam International Value Fund) and PHSTX (Putnam Global Health Care Fund) are both mutual funds - PNGAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Putnam, while PHSTX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by Putnam. Over the past 10 years, PNGAX returned 10.25%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for PHSTX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PNGAX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for PHSTX.
Performance
PNGAX vs. PHSTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNGAX achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly higher than PHSTX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PNGAX has outperformed PHSTX with an annualized return of 10.25%, while PHSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.42% annualized return.
PNGAX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 21.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
PHSTX
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 4.30%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 15.41%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
PNGAX vs. PHSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund | 8.75% | 34.66% | 5.86% | 18.50% | -6.85% | 14.24% | 4.19% | 19.96% | -18.02% | 24.09% |
PHSTX Putnam Global Health Care Fund | 0.36% | 15.20% | 1.35% | 9.11% | -4.88% | 19.60% | 15.94% | 30.26% | -0.76% | 15.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNGAX and PHSTX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 1996 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PNGAX and PHSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNGAX vs. PHSTX — Risk / Return Rank
PNGAX
PHSTX
PNGAX vs. PHSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) and Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNGAX | PHSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.20 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 1.66 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 4.05 | +3.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNGAX vs. PHSTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNGAX drawdown since its inception was -64.78%, which is greater than PHSTX's maximum drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNGAX and PHSTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNGAX | PHSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.78% | -45.51% | -19.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -9.71% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.87% | -20.71% | +6.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.37% | -20.71% | -6.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.58% | -25.51% | -16.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -3.78% | +2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -9.92% | -5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 3.96% | -1.09% |
Volatility
PNGAX vs. PHSTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) is 4.33%, while Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that PNGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNGAX | PHSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 4.86% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.87% | 10.51% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.61% | 14.50% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 14.47% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 15.80% | +1.26% |
PNGAX vs. PHSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNGAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than PHSTX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNGAX vs. PHSTX - Dividend Comparison
PNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than PHSTX's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSTX Putnam Global Health Care Fund | 1.78% | 1.79% | 4.92% | 5.62% | 7.82% | 11.98% | 9.58% | 5.72% | 6.82% | 17.31% | 10.65% | 13.06% |
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund | 2.73% | 2.97% | 3.89% | 2.35% | 1.63% | 5.70% | 1.84% | 3.91% | 4.34% | 1.11% | 2.23% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNGAX and PHSTX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHSTX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to PNGAX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNGAX dropped -64.78% vs PHSTX's -45.51%.
PNGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNGAX and PHSTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer