PMPIX vs. INPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) and ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX).
PMPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 2, 2002. INPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2000.
Performance
PMPIX vs. INPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PMPIX vs. INPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMPIX ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund | -0.39% | 273.51% | 5.35% | -1.78% | -20.47% | -14.71% | 28.27% | 72.99% | -21.10% | 6.55% |
INPIX ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund | -24.04% | 9.88% | 41.50% | 76.21% | -63.24% | -1.09% | 254.85% | 25.95% | 4.78% | 44.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMPIX achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly higher than INPIX's -24.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PMPIX has underperformed INPIX with an annualized return of 16.99%, while INPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.20% annualized return.
PMPIX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -35.81%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 139.44%
- 3Y*
- 50.72%
- 5Y*
- 24.38%
- 10Y*
- 16.99%
INPIX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -10.90%
- YTD
- -24.04%
- 6M
- -29.12%
- 1Y
- -2.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.16%
- 5Y*
- -5.96%
- 10Y*
- 20.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PMPIX vs. INPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMPIX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than INPIX's 1.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PMPIX vs. INPIX — Risk / Return Rank
PMPIX
INPIX
PMPIX vs. INPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) and ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMPIX | INPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.13 | -0.10 | +2.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 0.11 | +2.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.01 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | -0.26 | +3.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.61 | -0.73 | +12.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMPIX | INPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | -0.10 | +2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | -0.15 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.41 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.10 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between PMPIX and INPIX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PMPIX vs. INPIX - Dividend Comparison
PMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while INPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMPIX ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund | 0.43% | 0.43% | 1.89% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INPIX ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.45% | 21.43% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 6.69% |
Drawdowns
PMPIX vs. INPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMPIX drawdown since its inception was -94.34%, roughly equal to the maximum INPIX drawdown of -95.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMPIX and INPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMPIX | INPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.34% | -95.64% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.66% | -32.04% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.05% | -73.41% | +12.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.94% | -73.41% | +7.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.59% | -40.35% | -2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.86% | -46.38% | -13.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.13% | 11.68% | +0.45% |
Volatility
PMPIX vs. INPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) has a higher volatility of 23.48% compared to ProFunds Internet UltraSector Fund (INPIX) at 9.39%. This indicates that PMPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PMPIX | INPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.48% | 9.39% | +14.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.98% | 21.87% | +34.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.44% | 36.29% | +31.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.07% | 41.08% | +10.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.81% | 49.62% | +3.19% |