PMOC vs. PUSH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PMOC (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October) and PUSH (PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while PUSH is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMOC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PUSH.

Performance

PMOC vs. PUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October (PMOC) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMOC achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than PUSH's 1.32% return.

PMOC

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 6M: 3.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PUSH

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMOC vs. PUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMOC PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October	2.83%	0.93%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	1.32%	0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PMOC and PUSH is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

PMOC vs. PUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUSH

PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 88
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMOC vs. PUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October (PMOC) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMOC	PUSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.38	2.91	-0.53

Drawdowns

PMOC vs. PUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMOC drawdown since its inception was -1.50%, which is greater than PUSH's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMOC and PUSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMOC	PUSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-0.85%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-0.11%	-0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PMOC	PUSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42%	1.52%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.42%	1.30%	+1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.42%	1.30%	+1.12%

PMOC vs. PUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMOC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PUSH's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMOC vs. PUSH - Dividend Comparison

PMOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PMOC PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	3.23%	3.45%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMOC and PUSH in my portfolio?

PMOC and PUSH have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PMOC or PUSH?

On fees, PUSH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMOC or PUSH?

PUSH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMOC or PUSH?

PUSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.00% for PMOC.

What is the main difference between PMOC and PUSH?

PMOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PUSH is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMOC and 0.15% for PUSH.