PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMOC vs. STEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMOC vs. STEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October (PMOC) and iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMOC achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly lower than STEN's 7.45% return.


PMOC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.93%
6M
2.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

STEN

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.52%
YTD
7.45%
6M
7.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMOC vs. STEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMOC and STEN is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMOC vs. STEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - October (PMOC) and iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PMOC vs. STEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMOC vs. STEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMOC drawdown since its inception was -1.50%, smaller than the maximum STEN drawdown of -6.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMOC and STEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMOCSTENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-6.21%

+4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.61%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-0.93%

+0.72%

Volatility

PMOC vs. STEN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMOCSTENDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39%

9.42%

-7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.39%

9.42%

-7.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.39%

9.42%

-7.03%

PMOC vs. STEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PMOC and STEN have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

PMOC vs. STEN - Dividend Comparison

PMOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PMOC and STEN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMOC and STEN have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

STEN has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for PMOC.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and BlackRock.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMOC and STEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer